UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

NEBULA ACQUISITION CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

PROXY STATEMENT AND PROSPECTUS DATED MAY 22, 2020

NEBULA ACQUISITION CORPORATION

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Dear Nebula Acquisition Corporation Stockholders and Warrantholders:

You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting of stockholders and/or the special meeting of public warrantholders of Nebula Acquisition Corporation, which we refer to as “we,” “us,” “our,” or “Nebula,” at 11:00 a.m., Eastern time and 11:30 a.m., Eastern time, respectively, on June 9, 2020, at the offices of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, located at 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000, McLean, Virginia 22102.

The Special Meeting of Stockholders

At the special meeting of stockholders, our stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal, which we refer to as the “Business Combination Proposal,” to approve the Business Combination, as defined below, by the approval and adoption of a business combination agreement (as may be amended, the “Business Combination Agreement”) that Nebula has entered into with Open Lending, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Open Lending”), BRP Hold 11, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Blocker”), the Blocker’s sole stockholder (the “Blocker Holder”), Nebula Parent Corp., a Delaware corporation (“ParentCo”), NBLA Merger Sub LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Merger Sub LLC”), NBLA Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Merger Sub Corp”), and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, as the Securityholder Representative. Each of ParentCo, Merger Sub Corp and Merger Sub LLC are newly formed entities that were formed for the sole purpose of entering into and consummating the transactions set forth in the Business Combination Agreement. ParentCo is a wholly-owned direct subsidiary of Nebula and both Merger Sub LLC and Merger Sub Corp are wholly-owned direct subsidiaries of ParentCo. Pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, on the closing date, each of the following transactions will occur in the following order: (i) Merger Sub Corp will merge with and into Nebula (the “First Merger”), with Nebula surviving the First Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of ParentCo (the “NAC Surviving Company”); (ii) immediately following the First Merger and prior to the Blocker Contribution (as defined below), Blocker shall redeem a specified number of shares of Blocker common stock in exchange for cash (the “Blocker Redemption”); (iii) immediately following the Blocker Redemption, ParentCo will acquire, and the Blocker Holder will contribute to ParentCo the remaining shares of Blocker common stock after giving effect to the Blocker Redemption (the “Blocker Contribution”) such that, following the Blocker Contribution, Blocker will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of ParentCo; (iv) immediately following the Blocker Contribution, Merger Sub LLC will merge with and into Open Lending (the “Second Merger”), with Open Lending surviving the Second Merger as a direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ParentCo (the “Surviving Company”); (v) immediately following the Second Merger, Blocker will acquire, and ParentCo will contribute to Blocker, all common units of the Surviving Company directly held by ParentCo after the Second Merger such that the Surviving Company will be a wholly-owned subsidiary of Blocker; and (vi) the NAC Surviving Company will acquire, and ParentCo will contribute to the NAC Surviving Company, the remaining shares of Blocker common stock after giving effect to the Blocker Redemption and the Blocker Contribution (the “ParentCo Blocker Contribution”) such that, following the ParentCo Blocker Contribution, Blocker shall be a wholly-owned subsidiary of the NAC Surviving Company (together with the other transactions related thereto, the “Business Combination”). Upon closing of the Business Combination (the “Closing”), the name of ParentCo is expected to change to “Open Lending Corporation” and Open Lending will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of ParentCo.

If Nebula stockholders approve the Business Combination Proposal and the parties consummate the Business Combination: (i) ParentCo is expected to issue an aggregate of 96,937,500 shares of common stock of ParentCo (“ParentCo Common Stock”) upon the Closing, (ii) the current holders of shares of Nebula’s Class A common stock (“Nebula Class A Common Stock”) and Nebula’s Class B common stock (the “Founder Shares”) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Business Combination (other than any redeemed shares) will receive one share of ParentCo Common Stock in exchange for each share of Nebula

Class A Common Stock or Founder Share held by them, or an aggregate of 34,375,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock (assuming no shares are redeemed); (iii) the equity holders of Open Lending will receive aggregate consideration with a value equal to $1,010,625,000, which, assuming no redemptions of Nebula Class A Common Stock, will consist of (a) $585,000,000 in cash and (b) $425,625,000 in shares of ParentCo Common Stock, or 42,562,500 shares based on an assumed stock price of $10.00 per share. For additional information regarding the formulas used to determine the number of shares of ParentCo Common Stock and cash to be issued to unit holders of Open Lending, see the section entitled, “The Business Combination Agreement—Consideration to be Received in the Business Combination” beginning on page 123 of the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. The Business Combination Agreement also provides that the Blocker Holder and Open Lending’s unitholders will be issued an aggregate of up to 22,500,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock as follows: (i) 7,500,000 shares (the “First Level Contingency Consideration”), if prior to or as of the second anniversary of the Closing (the “First Deadline”), the daily volume-weighted average price of ParentCo Common Stock (the “VWAP”) is greater than or equal to $12.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period; (ii) 7,500,000 shares (the “Second Level Contingency Consideration”), if prior to or as of the 30-month anniversary of the Closing (the “Second Deadline”), the VWAP is greater than or equal to $14.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period; and (iii) 7,500,000 shares (the “Third Level Contingency Consideration”), if prior to or as of the 42-month anniversary of the Closing (the “Third Deadline”), the VWAP is greater than or equal to $16.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period. If a change of control of ParentCo occurs (i) prior to the First Deadline, then the First Level Contingency Consideration, the Second Level Contingency Consideration and the Third Level Contingency Consideration that remains unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the Open Lending unitholders and the Blocker Holder shall be entitled to receive all of such contingency consideration prior to the consummation of such change of control; (ii) after the First Deadline but prior to the Second Deadline, then the Second Level Contingency Consideration and Third Level Contingency Consideration that remains unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the Open Lending unitholders and the Blocker Holder shall be entitled to receive such Second Level Contingency Consideration and Third Level Contingency Consideration prior to the consummation of such change of control; and (iii) after the Second Deadline but prior to the Third Deadline, then the Third Level Contingency Consideration that remains unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the Open Lending Unitholders and the Blocker Holder shall be entitled to receive such Third Level Contingency Consideration prior to the consummation of such change of control.

In addition, the holders of the Nebula Class B Common Stock, including the Sponsor, will be issued an aggregate of up to 1,250,000 additional shares of ParentCo Common Stock as follows: (i) 625,000 shares (the “First Level Earn-Out Shares”), if prior to or as of the First Deadline, the VWAP is greater than or equal to $12.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period; and (ii) 625,000 shares (the “Second Level Earn-Out Shares”), if prior to or as of the Second Deadline, the VWAP is greater than or equal to $14.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period. If a change of control of ParentCo occurs (i) prior to the First Deadline, then the full First Level Earn-Out Shares and the Second Level Earn-Out Shares that remain unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the holders of the Nebula Class B Common Stock, including the Sponsor, shall be entitled to receive such First Level Earn-Out Shares and the Second Level Earn-Out Shares prior to the consummation of such change of control and (ii) after the First Deadline but prior to the Second Deadline, then the Second Level Earn-Out Shares that remain unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the holders of the Nebula Class B Common Stock, including the Sponsor, shall be entitled to receive such Second Level Earn-Out Shares prior to the consummation of such change of control. If Nebula’s warrantholders approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the Business Combination is consummated, the public warrantholders will receive an aggregate of approximately $13,750,000 in cash upon the Closing.

Open Lending is a leading provider of lending enablement and risk analytics to credit unions, regional banks and captive finance companies (the “OEM Captives”). Open Lending’s clients make automotive loans to underserved near-prime and non-prime borrowers by harnessing Open Lending’s risk-based pricing models,

2

powered by Open Lending’s proprietary data and real-time underwriting of automotive loan default insurance coverage from third-party insurance carriers.

In connection with the execution of the Business Combination Agreement, Nebula entered into the NAC Founder Support Agreement (the “Founder Support Agreement”), dated January 5, 2020 with the holders of the Founder Shares (including Nebula Holdings, LLC, our “Sponsor”), pursuant to which, among other things, (i) such holders agreed to approve the Business Combination Agreement and the Business Combination; and (ii) such holders agreed to forfeit (without consideration) all Nebula warrants held by them to Nebula, which warrants constitute all of the warrants sold in the private placement consummated in connection with the closing of Nebula’s initial public offering (the “Private Placement Warrants”).

Contemporaneously with the execution of the Business Combination Agreement, certain stockholders of Nebula entered into the Investor Support Agreement, pursuant to which, among other things, certain holders agreed (i) to approve the Business Combination Agreement and the Business Combination; (ii) not to redeem any shares held by such stockholders in connection with the Business Combination; and (iii) to tender any warrants to purchase Nebula Class A Common Stock held by such stockholder to Nebula for cash consideration of $1.50 per whole warrant and to vote all such warrants held by such Nebula stockholder in favor of any amendment to the terms of such warrants proposed by Nebula. Additionally, contemporaneously with the execution of the Business Combination Agreement, certain unitholders of Open Lending entered into the Company Support Agreement, pursuant to which such unitholders of Open Lending agreed to approve the Business Combination Agreement and the Business Combination.

It is anticipated that, upon completion of the Business Combination, Nebula’s existing stockholders, including our Sponsor, will own approximately 44.2% of the outstanding shares of ParentCo Common Stock, including 3,437,500 shares held by the Sponsor that will be subject to certain lock-up and forfeiture arrangements pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, that Open Lending’s existing unitholders will own approximately 43.9% of the outstanding shares of ParentCo Common Stock, and approximately 11.9% of the outstanding shares of ParentCo Common Stock will be held by certain interested investors who have committed to purchase shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock, which will be converted into shares of ParentCo Common Stock in connection with the closing of the Business Combination, for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, in a private placement. These percentages are calculated based on a number of assumptions and are subject to adjustment in accordance with the terms of the Business Combination Agreement. These relative percentages assume (i) that none of Nebula’s existing public stockholders exercise their redemption rights, and (ii) no Founder Shares are forfeited pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement. If any of Nebula’s public stockholders exercise redemption rights, or any of the other assumptions are not true, these percentages will be different. Please see “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for further information.

The Special Meeting of Warrantholders

At the special meeting of public warrantholders, holders of the warrants issued in Nebula’s initial public offering (the “Public Warrants”) will be asked to consider and vote on a proposal, which is referred to herein as the “Warrant Amendment Proposal,” to approve an amendment to the terms of the warrant agreement governing Nebula’s outstanding warrants to provide that, upon consummation of the Business Combination, each of Nebula’s outstanding Public Warrants, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock, will be exchanged for cash in the amount of $1.50 per Public Warrant (the “Warrant Amendment Proposal”). As described above, pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, our Sponsor agreed to forfeit (without consideration) all of their Nebula warrants to Nebula in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, which warrants constitute all of the Private Placement Warrants.

Under the Business Combination Agreement, the closing of the Business Combination is subject to a number of conditions, including (i) that Nebula stockholders approve the Business Combination Proposal and (ii) Nebula having, in the aggregate, cash that is equal to or greater than $295 million (less certain transaction expenses as described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus).

3

The Nebula Class A Common Stock and Nebula’s units and warrants are currently listed on The NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) under the symbols “NEBU,” “NEBU.U” and “NEBU.W,” respectively. ParentCo has applied to list its shares of common stock on NASDAQ under the symbol “LPRO” in connection with the closing of the Business Combination. We cannot assure you that ParentCo’s shares of common stock will be approved for listing on NASDAQ.

Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we are providing our public stockholders with the opportunity to redeem their shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock (“Public Shares”) for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust account, which holds the proceeds of our initial public offering, as of two business days prior to the consummation of the Business Combination, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes and for working capital purposes, upon the consummation of the Business Combination. For illustrative purposes, based on funds in the trust account of approximately $282.3 million on March 31, 2020, the estimated per share redemption price would have been approximately $10.26. Public stockholders may elect to redeem their Public Shares even if they vote for the Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals set forth herein. A Public Stockholder, together with any of his, her or its affiliates or any other person with whom it is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), will be restricted from redeeming his, her or its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the outstanding Public Shares. Holders of our outstanding warrants do not have redemption rights with respect to such warrants in connection with the Business Combination. All of the holders of our Founder Shares have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to such shares and any shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock that they may have acquired during or after our initial public offering in connection with the completion of the Business Combination. The Founder Shares will be excluded from the pro rata calculation used to determine the per-share redemption price. Currently, our Sponsor, owns approximately 19.7% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, consisting of approximately 98.5% of the Founder Shares, and our independent directors collectively own approximately 1.5% of the Founder Shares.

We are providing this proxy statement/prospectus and accompanying proxy cards to (i) our stockholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the special meeting of stockholders and at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting of stockholders; and (ii) to our warrantholders in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the special meeting of warrantholders and at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting of warrantholders. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meetings, we urge you to read this proxy statement/prospectus (and any documents incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference) carefully. Please pay particular attention to the section entitled “Risk Factors,” beginning on page 49.

Our board of directors has unanimously approved and adopted the Business Combination Agreement and unanimously recommends that our stockholders vote FOR all of the proposals presented to our stockholders and that our warrantholders vote FOR the Warrant Amendment Proposal. When you consider the board of directors’ recommendation of these proposals, you should keep in mind that certain of our directors and our officers have interests in the Business Combination that may conflict with your interests as a stockholder or warrantholder. See the section entitled “The Business Combination—Interests of Nebula’s Directors and Officers in the Business Combination.”

Approval of each of the Business Combination Proposal and the Charter Amendment Proposals requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting. Each of the Nasdaq Proposal, 2020 Plan Proposal and the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock represented in person or by proxy and voted thereon at the special meeting. Approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the Public Warrants issued and outstanding as of the record date. The approval of the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Public Warrants that are voted at the special meeting of warrantholders.

4

We have no specified maximum redemption threshold under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. It is a condition to closing under the Business Combination Agreement, however, that Nebula has, in the aggregate, cash (held both in and outside of the trust account) equal to or greater than $295 million (less certain transaction expenses as described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus). If redemptions by Nebula’s public stockholders cause Nebula to be unable to meet this closing condition, then Open Lending will not be required to consummate the Business Combination, although it may, in its sole discretion, waive this condition. In the event that Open Lending waives this condition, Nebula does not intend to seek additional stockholder approval or to extend the time period in which its public stockholders can exercise their redemption rights. In no event, however, will we redeem Public Shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001.

The holders of our Founder Shares have agreed to vote their Founder Shares, which represent approximately 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of Nebula Common Stock, and any shares of Nebula Common Stock acquired during or after our initial public offering in favor of the Business Combination Proposal.

Your vote is very important. If you are a holder of record of Nebula Class A Common Stock or Public Warrants, you must submit proxies to have your shares or warrants, as applicable, voted. Please vote as soon as possible to ensure that your vote is counted, regardless of whether you expect to attend either the special meeting of stockholders or the special meeting of warrantholders in person. Please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided.

If you hold your shares or public warrants in “street name” through a bank, broker or other nominee, you will need to follow the instructions provided to you by your bank, broker or other nominee to ensure that your shares are represented and voted at the special meetings. A failure to vote your shares will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Business Combination Proposal and each of the Charter Amendment Proposals and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on the Nasdaq Proposal or 2020 Plan Proposal. A failure to vote your warrants will have the same effect as a vote against the Warrant Amendment Proposal.

If you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how you wish to vote, your proxy will be voted in favor of each of the proposals presented at the special meetings. If you fail to return your proxy card or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee how to vote, and do not attend the special meetings in person, the effect will be that your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the special meetings of stockholders and warrantholders and, if a quorum is present, will have no effect on the proposals. If you are a stockholder or warrantholder of record and you attend the special meetings and wish to vote in person, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person. If you are a warrantholder and you fail to return your proxy or fail to instruct your bank, broker or other nominee to submit the proxy on your behalf, the effect will be that your proxy will not be counted for purposes of approving the Warrant Amendment and will have the same effect as a vote against the Warrant Amendment.

On behalf of our board of directors, I thank you for your support and look forward to the successful completion of the Business Combination.

This proxy statement/prospectus is dated May 22, 2020 and is first being mailed to the stockholders and warrantholders of Nebula on or about that date.

5

NEITHER THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORY AGENCY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE TRANSACTIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS OR ANY OF THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED IN THE BUSINESS COMBINATION, PASSED UPON THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION OR RELATED TRANSACTIONS OR PASSED UPON THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.

6

NEBULA ACQUISITION CORPORATION

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2100

San Francisco, CA 94111

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 9, 2020

To the Stockholders of Nebula Acquisition Corporation:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of stockholders (the “special meeting of stockholders”) of Nebula Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Nebula”), will be held on June 9, 2020, at 11:00 a.m., Eastern time, at the offices of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, located at 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000, McLean, Virginia 22102. You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting of stockholders for the following purposes:

(A) increase the number of authorized shares of ParentCo Common Stock from 111,000,000 to 550,000,000 and the number of authorized shares of ParentCo’s preferred stock, $0.01 per share, from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000;

(B) change the vote required to remove a director of ParentCo from a majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class to not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding shares of capital stock then entitled to vote at an election of directors, voting together as a single class; and

(C) change the vote required to amend ParentCo’s bylaws from a majority of the members of the Nebula board or by the stockholders, or by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of Nebula entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, to not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding shares of capital stock generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class; provided, however that if the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders approve such amendment or repeal at such meeting of stockholders, such amendment or repeal shall only require the affirmative vote of the majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote on such amendment or repeal, voting together as a single class;

Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on May 13, 2020 are entitled to notice of the special meeting of stockholders and to vote at the special meeting of stockholders and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting of stockholders. A complete list of our stockholders of record entitled to vote at the special meeting of stockholders will be available for ten days before the special meeting of stockholders at our principal executive offices for inspection by stockholders during ordinary business hours for any purpose germane to the special meeting of stockholders.

Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, we are providing the holders of our Public Shares (our “Public Stockholders”) with the opportunity to redeem their shares of our Class A common stock (the “Public Shares”) for cash equal to their pro rata share of the aggregate amount on deposit in the trust account which holds the proceeds of our initial public offering as of two business days prior to the consummation of the business combination contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement (the “Business Combination”), including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes and for working capital purposes, upon the consummation of the Business Combination. For illustrative purposes, based on funds in the trust account of approximately $282.3 million on March 31, 2020, the estimated per share redemption price would have been approximately $10.26. Public Stockholders may elect to redeem their shares even if they vote for the Business Combination Proposal and any of the other proposals presented. A Public Stockholder, together with any of his, her or its affiliates or any other person with whom it is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), will be restricted from redeeming his, her or its shares with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the Public Shares. Holders of our outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our Class A common stock do not have redemption rights with respect to such warrants in connection with the Business Combination. All of the holders of our Class B common stock (“Founder Shares”) have agreed to waive their redemption rights with respect to their Founder Shares and any Public Shares that they may have acquired during or after our initial public offering in connection with the completion of the Business Combination. The Founder

2

Shares will be excluded from the pro rata calculation used to determine the per-share redemption price. Currently, Nebula Holdings, LLC (our “Sponsor”) owns approximately 19.7% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, consisting of 98.5% of the Founder Shares.

The transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement will be consummated only if a majority of the outstanding shares of Nebula Common Stock are voted in favor of the Business Combination Proposal at the special meeting of stockholders. We have no specified maximum redemption threshold under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. It is a condition to closing under the Business Combination Agreement, however, that Nebula has, in the aggregate, cash (held both in and outside of the trust account) equal to or greater than the sum of $295 million (less certain transaction expenses as described in the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus). If redemptions by Nebula’s public stockholders cause Nebula to be unable to meet this closing condition, then Open Lending will not be required to consummate the Business Combination, although it may, in its sole discretion, waive this condition. In the event that Open Lending waives this condition, Nebula does not intend to seek additional stockholder approval or to extend the time period in which its public stockholders can exercise their redemption rights. In no event, however, will we redeem Public Shares in an amount that would cause our net tangible assets to be less than $5,000,001.

Your attention is directed to the proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice (including the financial statements and annexes attached thereto) for a more complete description of the proposed Business Combination and related transactions and each of our proposals. We encourage you to read this proxy statement/prospectus carefully. If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares, please call our proxy solicitor, Morrow Sodali LLC, at (800) 622-5200, banks and brokers may reach Morrow Sodali LLC at (203) 658-9400.

3

NEBULA ACQUISITION CORPORATION

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2100

San Francisco, CA 94111

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF WARRANTHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON JUNE 9, 2020

To the Warrantholders of Nebula Acquisition Corporation:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the public warrantholders (the “special meeting of warrantholders”) of Nebula Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Nebula”), will be held on June 9, 2020, at 11:30 a.m., Eastern time, at the offices of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, located at 1750 Tysons Boulevard, Suite 1000, McLean, Virginia 22102. You are cordially invited to attend the special meeting of warrantholders for the following purposes:

Only holders of record of Nebula Public Warrants at the close of business on May 13, 2020 are entitled to notice of the special meeting of warrantholders and to vote at the special meeting of warrantholders and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting of warrantholders. A complete list of our warrantholders of record entitled to vote at the special meeting of warrantholders will be available for ten days before the special meeting of warrantholders at our principal executive offices for inspection by warrantholders during ordinary business hours for any purpose germane to the special meeting of warrantholders.

Both the approval of the Warrant Amendment and the completion of the redemptions of the Public Warrants in connection with the Warrant Amendment are conditions to the closing of the Business Combination as contemplated under the Business Combination Agreement.

IF THE WARRANT AMENDMENT IS APPROVED AND THE BUSINESS COMBINATION IS CONSUMMATED, YOUR WARRANTS WILL BE SUBJECT TO MANDATORY EXCHANGE FOR $1.50 PER PUBLIC WARRANT UPON CLOSING OF THE BUSINESS COMBINATION WHETHER OR NOT YOU VOTED TO APPROVE THE WARRANT AMENDMENT.

Your attention is directed to the proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice (including the financial statements and annexes attached thereto) for a more complete description of the proposed Business Combination and related transactions and each of our proposals. We encourage you to read this proxy statement/prospectus carefully. If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares, please call our proxy solicitor, Morrow Sodali LLC, at (800) 622-5200, banks and brokers may reach Morrow Sodali LLC at (203) 658-9400.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

This document, which forms part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) by ParentCo (File No. 333-237264), constitutes a prospectus of ParentCo under Section 5 of the Securities Act, with respect to the shares of ParentCo Common Stock to be issued if the Business Combination described below is consummated. This document also constitutes a notice of meeting and a proxy statement under Section 14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) with respect to the special meeting of Nebula stockholders at which Nebula stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the Business Combination by the approval and adoption of the Business Combination Agreement, among other matters.

1

FREQUENTLY USED TERMS

In this document:

“2020 Plan” means the Open Lending Corporation 2020 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.

“2020 Plan Proposal” means the proposal to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt the 2020 Plan, and the material terms thereunder.

“Active automotive lender” means an automotive lender that issued at least one insured loan in the previous quarter.

“Blocker” means BRP Hold 11, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

“Blocker Holder” means Bregal Sagemount I, L.P., Blocker’s sole stockholder.

“broker non-vote” means the failure of a Nebula stockholder, who holds his or her shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, to give voting instructions to such broker or other nominee.

“Business Combination” means the transactions contemplated by the Business Combination Agreement.

“Business Combination Agreement” means the Business Combination Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2020, as may be amended, by and among Nebula, Open Lending, Blocker, Blocker Holder, ParentCo, Merger Sub LLC, Merger Sub Corp, and Shareholder Representative Services LLC.

“Business Combination Proposal” means the proposal to approve the adoption of the Business Combination Agreement and the Business Combination.

“Charter Amendment Proposals” means the proposals to consider and vote upon proposals to approve the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ParentCo, a copy of which is attached to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C, reflecting the differences from Nebula’s current Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth herein.

“Closing” means the consummation of the Business Combination.

“Closing Date” means the date upon which the Closing is to occur.

“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

“Combined Company” means ParentCo and its consolidated subsidiaries after giving effect to the Business Combination.

“Company Support Agreement” means the Company Support Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2020, by and among Nebula and certain Open Lending unitholders, a copy of which is included as Exhibit 10.3 to Nebula’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated January 6, 2020.

“DGCL” means the Delaware General Corporation Law.

“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“First Effective Time” means the time at which the First Merger becomes effective.

“First Merger” means the merging of Merger Sub Corp with and into Nebula, with Nebula surviving the First Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of ParentCo.

2

“Founder Shares” means the shares of Nebula Class B Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

“Founder Support Agreement” means the Founder Support Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2020, by and among Nebula, ParentCo, Open Lending, and the holders of the Founder Shares, a copy of which is included as Exhibit 10.1 to Nebula’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 6, 2020.

“GAAP” means United States generally accepted accounting principles.

“Initial Stockholders” means the holders of shares of Founder Shares.

“Investment Company Act” means the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.

“Investor Rights Agreement” means the Investor Rights Agreement, to be entered into at the Closing, by and among Nebula, ParentCo, Open Lending, certain persons and entities holding Open Lending Membership Units, and certain persons and entities holding Founder Shares, the form of which is included as Exhibit G to the Business Combination Agreement.

“Investor Support Agreement” means the Investor Support Agreement, dated as of January 5, 2020, by and among Nebula and certain Nebula stockholders, a form of which is included as Exhibit 10.2 to Nebula’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 6, 2020.

“IPO” means Nebula’s initial public offering of units, consummated on January 12, 2018.

“JOBS Act” means the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended.

“Member Approval” means the approval and adoption of the Second Merger, the Business Combination Agreement and the Proposed Transactions and thereby the requisite affirmative vote of the members of Open Lending in accordance with the Texas Business Organizations Code and the organizational documents.

“Merger Sub Corp” means NBLA Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation.

“Merger Sub LLC” means NBLA Merger Sub LLC, a Texas Limited Liability company.

“NASDAQ” means The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC.

“Nasdaq Proposal” means the proposal to approve, for purposes of complying with applicable listing rules of NASDAQ, the issuance of more than 20% of the current total issued and outstanding shares of Nebula Common Stock.

“Nebula” refers to Nebula Acquisition Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

“Nebula Class A Common Stock” means Nebula’s Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.

“Nebula Common Stock” means the Nebula Class A Common Stock and the Founder Shares, collectively.

“Nebula Units” means the 27,500,000 units issued in connection with the IPO, each of which consisted of one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock and one-third of one Nebula Warrant.

“Nebula Warrants” means the Public Warrants and the Private Placement Warrants.

“OEM Captives” means captive finance companies of Original Equipment Manufacturers.

“Open Lending” refers to Open Lending, LLC, a Texas limited liability company

“Open Lending Membership Units” means all issued and outstanding interests of Open Lending.

3

“Open Lending Unitholders” means the holders of all issued and outstanding interests of Open Lending.

“ParentCo” refers to Nebula Parent Corp., a Delaware corporation.

“ParentCo Common Stock” means the shares of common stock of ParentCo, par value $0.01 per share.

“PCAOB” means the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

“PIPE” means commitments from interested investors to purchase shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock, which will be converted into shares of ParentCo Common Stock in connection with the Closing, for a purchase price of $10.00 per share, in a private placement.

“Private Placement Warrants” means the warrants to purchase Nebula Class A Common Stock purchased in a private placement in connection with the IPO.

“prospectus” means the prospectus included in the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-237264) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Public Shares” means shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock issued as part of the units sold in the IPO.

“Public Stockholders” means the holders of shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock.

“Public Warrants” means the warrants included in the units sold in Nebula’s IPO, each of which is exercisable for one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock, in accordance with its terms.

“SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

“Second Effective Time” means the time at which the Second Merger becomes effective.

“Second Merger” means the merger of Merger Sub LLC with and into Open Lending, with Open Lending surviving the Second Merger as a direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ParentCo.

“Securities Act” means the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

“Sponsor” means Nebula Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company.

“Stockholder Adjournment Proposal” means a proposal to adjourn the special meeting of the stockholders of Nebula to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the special meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve one or more proposals presented to stockholders for vote at such special meeting or Public Stockholders have elected to redeem an amount of Public Shares such that the minimum available cash condition to the obligation to closing of the Business Combination would not be satisfied.

“Surviving Company Common Units” means units of Open Lending designated as Common Units under the Surviving Company Liability Company Agreement to be issued at the Second Effective Time.

“Tax Receivable Agreement” means the Tax Receivable Agreement, to be entered into at the Closing, by and among Nebula, ParentCo, Blocker, Blocker Holder, Open Lending, and each beneficiary, the form of which is included as Exhibit F to the Business Combination Agreement.

“Trust Account” means the trust account that holds a portion of the proceeds of the IPO and the concurrent sale of the Private Placement Warrants.

4

“Warrant Agreement” means the warrant agreement, dated January 9, 2018, by and between Nebula and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC, governing Nebula’s outstanding warrants.

“Warrant Amendment” means the amendment to the terms of the Warrant Agreement to provide that, upon consummation of the Business Combination, each of Nebula’s outstanding Public Warrants, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock, will be exchanged for cash in the amount of $1.50 per Public Warrant.

“Warrant Amendment Proposal” means a proposal to approve the adoption of the Warrant Amendment.

“Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal” means a proposal to adjourn the special meeting of the warrantholders of Nebula to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the special meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve one or more proposals presented to warrantholders for vote at such special meeting.

5

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE BUSINESS COMBINATION

The following questions and answers briefly address some commonly asked questions about the proposals to be presented at the special meetings of stockholders and warrantholders, including with respect to the proposed Business Combination. The following questions and answers may not include all the information that is important to Nebula’s stockholders and warrantholders. Stockholders and warrantholders are urged to read carefully this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including the financial statements and annexes attached hereto and the other documents referred to herein.

Questions and Answers About the Special Meeting of Nebula’s Stockholders and the Related Proposals

As a result of the Business Combination: (i) the holders of all shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the First Effective Time will receive one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of ParentCo Common Stock in exchange for each share of Nebula Class A Common Stock held by them; (ii) the holders of all Founder Shares issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the First Effective Time will receive one validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable share of ParentCo Common Stock; and (iii) the equity holders of Open Lending will receive an aggregate of up to 54,562,500 shares of ParentCo Common Stock. As a result of the Business Combination, Open Lending will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of ParentCo. Please see “The Business Combination Agreement—Ownership of the Combined Company Upon Completion of the Business Combination” and “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for further information.

Nebula stockholders are being asked to consider and vote upon the Business Combination Proposal to approve the adoption of the Business Combination Agreement and the Business Combination, among other proposals.

Holders of Nebula’s Public Warrants are being asked to consider and vote upon the Warrant Amendment Proposal to approve an amendment to the terms of the Warrant Agreement governing Nebula’s outstanding warrants to provide that, upon consummation of the Business Combination, each of Nebula’s outstanding Public Warrants, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock, will be exchanged for cash in the amount of $1.50 per Public Warrant. The Warrant Amendment will be contingent upon Nebula’s stockholders approving the Business Combination. Pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, our Sponsor agreed to forfeit (without consideration) all Private Placement Warrants to Nebula in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination.

The Nebula Class A Common Stock, Public Warrants and Nebula Units are currently listed on NASDAQ under the symbols “NEBU,” “NEBU.W” and “NEBU.U,” respectively. Upon the closing of the Business Combination, the name of ParentCo is expected to change to Open Lending Corporation. ParentCo has applied to list its shares of ParentCo Common Stock on NASDAQ under the symbol “LPRO” in connection with the Closing. All outstanding Nebula Units will be separated into their underlying securities immediately prior to the Closing. Accordingly, ParentCo will not have units following consummation of the Business Combination, and therefore there will be no NASDAQ listing of the Units following the consummation of the Business Combination. If the Warrant Amendment is approved by Nebula’s warrantholders, Nebula’s Public Warrants on the date of the consummation of the Business Combination

6

will be canceled and exchanged for $1.50 per warrant in connection with the Closing. The Public Warrants will no longer be listed on NASDAQ following the consummation of the Business Combination.

This proxy statement/prospectus and its annexes contain important information about the proposed Business Combination and the proposals to be acted upon at the special meeting. You should read this proxy statement/prospectus and its annexes carefully and in their entirety. This document also constitutes a prospectus of ParentCo with respect to the ParentCo Common Stock issuable in connection with the Business Combination.

The Business Combination Proposal—a proposal to approve and adopt the Business Combination Agreement and the Business Combination.

The Charter Amendment Proposals—proposals to consider and vote upon proposals to approve the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of ParentCo, a copy of which is attached to the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C, reflecting the following differences from Nebula’s current Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation:

(A) increase the number of authorized shares of ParentCo Common Stock from 111,000,000 to 550,000,000 and the number of authorized shares of ParentCo’s preferred stock, $0.01 per share, from 1,000,000 to 10,000,000;

(B) change the vote required to remove a director of ParentCo from a majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class to not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding shares of capital stock then entitled to vote at an election of directors, voting together as a single class; and

(C) change the vote required to amend ParentCo’s bylaws from a majority of the members of the Nebula board or by the stockholders, or by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the voting power of all then outstanding shares of capital stock of Nebula entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, to not less than two-thirds (2/3) of the outstanding shares of capital stock generally entitled to vote, voting together as a single class; provided, however that if the Board of Directors recommends that stockholders approve such amendment or repeal at such meeting of stockholders, such amendment or repeal shall only require the affirmative vote of the majority of the outstanding shares of capital stock entitled to vote on such amendment or repeal, voting together as a single class.

The Nasdaq Proposal—a proposal to approve the issuance of more than 20% of the current total issued and outstanding Nebula Common Stock, for purposes of complying with the applicable listing rules of NASDAQ.

The 2020 Plan Proposal—a proposal to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt the 2020 Plan, and the material terms thereunder.

The Stockholder Adjournment Proposal—a proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies if, based upon the tabulated vote at the time of the special meeting, there are not sufficient votes to approve one or more proposals presented to stockholders for vote or Public Stockholders have elected to redeem an amount of Public Shares such that the minimum available cash condition to the obligation to closing of the Business Combination would not be satisfied.

7

Nebula received $275,000,000 from its IPO (including net proceeds from the partial exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option) and sale of the Private Placement Warrants, which was placed

8

into the Trust Account immediately following the IPO. In accordance with Nebula’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the funds held in the Trust Account will be released upon the consummation of the Business Combination. See the question entitled “What happens to the funds held in the Trust Account upon consummation of the Business Combination?”

There currently are 34,375,000 shares of Nebula Common Stock issued and outstanding, consisting of 27,500,000 shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock originally sold as part of the Nebula Units in Nebula’s IPO (including 2,500,000 Units purchased by the underwriters pursuant to the partial exercise of their over-allotment option) and 6,875,000 Founder Shares that were issued to the Sponsor prior to Nebula’s IPO (of which 25,000 Founder Shares were subsequently transferred to each of Nebula’s independent directors (adjusted to give effect to the forfeiture of an aggregate of 312,500 Founder Shares by the Sponsor in connection with the partial exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option)). In addition, there currently are 14,166,666 Nebula Warrants issued and outstanding, including 5,000,000 Private Placement Warrants that were sold by Nebula to the Sponsor in a private sale simultaneously with Nebula’s IPO. Each whole Nebula Warrant entitles the holder thereof to purchase one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock at a price of $11.50 per share. The Nebula Warrants will become exercisable 30 days after the completion of Nebula’s initial business combination, and expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City time, five years after the completion of Nebula’s initial business combination or earlier upon redemption or liquidation. The Private Placement Warrants, however, are non-redeemable so long as they are held by their initial purchaser, the Sponsor or its permitted transferees. There are no shares of Nebula preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Under Nebula’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, Nebula must provide all holders of Public Shares with the opportunity to have their Public Shares redeemed upon the consummation of Nebula’s initial business combination either in conjunction with a tender offer or in conjunction with a stockholder vote.

9

Assuming that (i) Public Stockholders exercise their redemption rights with regard to 12,000,000 Public Shares, (ii) the Initial Stockholders exchange all outstanding Founder Shares for ParentCo Common Stock upon completion of the Business Combination, (iii) the Warrant Amendment is approved by Nebula’s warrantholders and Nebula’s Public Warrants outstanding on the date of the Consummation of the Business Combination will be canceled and exchanged for $1.50 per Public Warrant, (v) no Founder Shares are forfeited pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, (vi) no additional equity securities of Nebula are issued, other than the 20,000,000 shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock currently subscribed for and to be issued in connection with the PIPE, Nebula’s existing stockholders, including the Sponsor, will own approximately 31.9% of the issued and outstanding shares of ParentCo Common Stock, including 3,437,500 shares held by the Sponsor that will be subject to certain lock-up and forfeiture arrangements pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, and Open Lending existing unitholders will own approximately 56.3% of the issued and outstanding shares of ParentCo Common Stock upon completion of the Business Combination. If the actual facts are different than these assumptions, the percentage ownership retained by Nebula’s existing stockholders will be different.

The Business Combination Agreement also provides that the Blocker Holder and Open Lending’s unitholders will be issued an aggregate of up to 22,500,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock as follows: (i) 7,500,000 shares (the “First Level Contingency Consideration”), if prior to or as of the second anniversary of the Closing (the “First Deadline”), the daily volume-weighted average price of ParentCo Common Stock (the “VWAP”) is greater than or equal to $12.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period; (ii) 7,500,000 shares (the “Second Level Contingency Consideration”), if prior to or as

10

of the 30-month anniversary of the Closing (the “Second Deadline”), the VWAP is greater than or equal to $14.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period; and (iii) 7,500,000 shares (the “Third Level Contingency Consideration”), if prior to or as of the 42-month anniversary of the Closing (the “Third Deadline”), the VWAP is greater than or equal to $16.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period. If a change of control of ParentCo occurs (i) prior to the First Deadline, then the First Level Contingency Consideration, the Second Level Contingency Consideration and the Third Level Contingency Consideration that remains unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the Open Lending unitholders and the Blocker Holder shall be entitled to receive all of such contingency consideration prior to the consummation of such change of control; (ii) after the First Deadline but prior to the Second Deadline, then the Second Level Contingency Consideration and Third Level Contingency Consideration that remains unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the Open Lending unitholders and the Blocker Holder shall be entitled to receive such Second Level Contingency Consideration and Third Level Contingency Consideration prior to the consummation of such change of control; and (iii) after the Second Deadline but prior to the Third Deadline, then the Third Level Contingency Consideration that remains unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the Open Lending Unitholders and the Blocker Holder shall be entitled to receive such Third Level Contingency Consideration prior to the consummation of such change of control.

In addition, the holders of the Nebula Class B Common Stock, including the Sponsor, will be issued an aggregate of up to 1,250,000 additional shares of ParentCo Common Stock as follows: (i) 625,000 shares (the “First Level Earn-Out Shares”), if prior to or as of the First Deadline, the VWAP is greater than or equal to $12.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period; and (ii) 625,000 shares (the “Second Level Earn-Out Shares”), if prior to or as of the Second Deadline, the VWAP is greater than or equal to $14.00 over any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period. If a change of control of ParentCo occurs (i) prior to the First Deadline, then the full First Level Earn-Out Shares and the Second Level Earn-Out Shares that remain unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the holders of the Nebula Class B Common Stock, including the Sponsor, shall be entitled to receive such First Level Earn-Out Shares and the Second Level Earn-Out Shares prior to the consummation of such change of control and (ii) after the First Deadline but prior to the Second Deadline, then the Second Level Earn-Out Shares that remain unissued as of immediately prior to the consummation of such change of control shall immediately vest and the holders of the Nebula Class B Common Stock, including the Sponsor, shall be entitled to receive such Second Level Earn-Out Shares prior to the consummation of such change of control. If Nebula’s warrantholders approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal and the Business Combination is consummated, the public warrantholders will receive an aggregate of approximately $13,750,000 in cash upon the Closing.

The following table illustrates four scenarios of varying ownership levels in ParentCo immediately after the Closing based on the assumptions described above but assuming varying levels of redemptions by the Public Stockholders:

11

The Investor Rights Agreement will provide for certain designation rights with respect to the ParentCo Board, such that the Sponsor and the Blocker Holder will each have the right to designate two board representatives for a period of five years following the Closing, or such shorter period if they reduce their ownership in ParentCo below certain thresholds. Each of the Sponsor and the Blocker Holder will have the right to designate (i) one individual to serve as a Class I director of ParentCo; and (ii) one individual to serve as a Class II director of ParentCo; provided, however, that if any time during such five-year period, the Sponsor or the Blocker Holder owns less than 8,000,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock but more than 4,000,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock (in each case, as adjusted for any share split, share dividend or other share recapitalization, share exchange or other event), then the Sponsor or the Blocker Holder, as the case may be, will have the right to designate only one individual to serve as a Class I director of ParentCo, and if at any time during such five-year period the Sponsor or the Blocker Holder owns less than 4,000,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock (as adjusted for any share split, share dividend or other share recapitalization, share exchange or other event), the rights of the Sponsor or the Blocker Holder to designate an individual to serve on the ParentCo Board, as the case may be, shall terminate. The Investor Rights Agreement also provides for certain designation rights with respect to the ParentCo Board, such that Open Lending’s founders will have the right to designate two Class III directors for a period of five years following the Closing, or such shorter period if they reduce their ownership in ParentCo below certain thresholds. Open Lending’s founders will have the right to designate two individuals to serve as a Class III directors of ParentCo; provided, however, that if any time during such five-year period, Open Lending’s founders own less than 8,000,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock but more than 4,000,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock (in each case, as adjusted for any share split, share dividend or other share recapitalization, share exchange or other event), then Open Lending’s founders will have the right to designate only one individual to serve as a Class III director of ParentCo, and if at any time during such

12

five-year period Open Lending’s founders own less than 4,000,000 shares of ParentCo Common Stock (as adjusted for any share split, share dividend or other share recapitalization, share exchange or other event), the rights of Open Lending’s founders to designate an individual to serve on the ParentCo Board shall terminate.

The Class I directors are expected to be Brandon Van Buren, a designee of the Sponsor, and Gene Yoon, a designee of the Blocker Holder. The Class II directors are expected to be Adam H. Clammer, a designee of the Sponsor, and Blair Greenberg, a designee of the Blocker Holder. The Class III directors are expected to be John Flynn, Open Lending’s Chief Executive Officer and Ross Jessup, Open Lending’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, both whom are designees of Open Lending’s founders. Nebula, Blocker Holder and Open Lending will each select one director to serve on each of the Class I and Class II slates of directors. Open Lending will select all three of the Class III directors.

The approval of each of the Nasdaq Proposal, the 2020 Plan Proposal and the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of Nebula Common Stock that are voted thereon at the special meeting of stockholders. Accordingly, a Nebula stockholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting of stockholders, an abstention from voting, or a broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of any vote on the Nasdaq Proposal, the 2020 Plan Proposal or the Stockholder Adjournment Proposal.

13

If Open Lending’s unitholders fail to approve the Business Combination Agreement, and the Business Combination Agreement is terminated as a result, and if (and only if) at the time of such termination: (a) each of the closing conditions set forth in Section 8.01 of the Business Combination Agreement shall have been satisfied or waived by Nebula and Open Lending (other than the condition set forth in Section 8.01(g) of the Business Combination Agreement); and (b) each of the closing conditions set forth in Section 8.03 of the Business Combination Agreement shall have been satisfied or waived by Open Lending (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing of the Business Combination, but subject to Nebula certifying in writing to Open Lending that Nebula shall satisfy such conditions at the closing of the Business Combination and that Nebula will consummate the closing of the Business Combination within three business days after the date on which the condition set forth in Section 8.01(g) of the Business Combination Agreement shall have been satisfied), then Open Lending shall pay to Nebula, a non-refundable termination fee in the amount of $40,000,000 (the “Termination Fee”). The Termination Fee shall be made promptly, but in no event later than sixty days, following the termination of the Business Combination Agreement. In the event of any payment of the Termination Fee to Nebula, Nebula will allocate any such amounts as follows: (i) to pay the expenses of Nebula, including professional fees, incurred in connection with the Business Combination; (ii) to purchase from the Sponsor the warrants to purchase Nebula Class A Common Stock that the Sponsor purchased in connection with the IPO; (iii) to reimburse Nebula for its expenses in connection with the Business Combination; (iv) to pay the expenses incurred by the Subscribers (as defined below) in connection with the PIPE; (v) to pay certain other fees and expenses in connection with the Business Combination and the PIPE; (vi) to pay $25,000 to the Sponsor; and (vii) to pay any taxes applicable to Nebula. After such payments, the remaining portion of the Termination Fee will be divided among the holders of Nebula Class A Common Stock eligible to receive distributions upon the liquidation of Nebula at such time and the Subscribers who committed to purchase ParentCo Common Stock in the PIPE.

14

15

These interests may influence Nebula’s directors in making their recommendation to vote in favor of the approval of the Business Combination Proposal. Please read the section entitled “The Business Combination—Interests of Nebula’s Directors and Officers in the Business Combination.”

16

It is a condition to closing under the Business Combination Agreement, however, that Nebula has, in the aggregate, cash (held both in and outside of the Trust Account) that is equal to or greater than $295 million (less NAC Expenses, as defined in the Business Combination Agreement) without any breach, inaccuracy or failure to perform any of the representations, warranties or covenants set forth in the Business Combination Agreement. If redemptions by Public Stockholders cause Nebula to be unable to meet this closing condition, then Open Lending will not be required to consummate the Business Combination, although it may, in its sole discretion, waive this condition.

17

A physical stock certificate will not be needed if your stock is delivered to Nebula’s transfer agent electronically. In order to obtain a physical stock certificate, a stockholder’s broker and/or clearing broker, DTC and Nebula’s transfer agent will need to act to facilitate the request. It is Nebula’s understanding that stockholders should generally allot at least one week to obtain physical certificates from the transfer agent. However, because Nebula does not have any control over this process or over the brokers or DTC, it may take significantly longer than one week to obtain a physical stock certificate. If it takes longer than anticipated to obtain a physical certificate, stockholders who wish to redeem their shares may be unable to obtain physical certificates by the deadline for exercising their redemption rights and thus will be unable to redeem their shares.

Any demand for redemption, once made, may be withdrawn at any time until the deadline for exercising redemption requests and thereafter, with Nebula’s consent, until the vote is taken with respect to the

Business Combination. If you delivered your shares for redemption to Nebula’s transfer agent and decide within the required timeframe not to exercise your redemption rights, you may request that Nebula’s transfer agent return the shares (physically or electronically). Such requests may be made by contacting Nebula’s transfer agent at the phone number or address listed under the question “Who can help answer my questions?”

18

If, as a result of the termination of the Business Combination Agreement or otherwise, Nebula is unable to complete a business combination by June 12, 2020, or amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to extend the date by which Nebula must consummate an initial business combination, Nebula’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that Nebula will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than 10 business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes (less $500,000 of interest released to us for working capital purposes and $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish Public Stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law; and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of Nebula’s remaining stockholders and Nebula’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to Nebula’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. See the section entitled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Nebula and the Business Combination—Nebula may not be able to complete the Business Combination within the prescribed time frame, in which case Nebula would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and Nebula would redeem its Public Shares and liquidate, in which case Nebula’s Public Stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and Nebula’s warrants will expire worthless” and “—Nebula’s stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against Nebula to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.” Holders of Founder Shares have waived any right to any liquidation distribution with respect to those shares.

19

In the event of liquidation, there will be no distribution with respect to outstanding Nebula Warrants. Accordingly, the Nebula Warrants will expire worthless.

For a description of the conditions to the completion of the Business Combination, see the section entitled “Nebula Stockholder Proposal No. 1—The Business Combination Proposal.”

20

As of the record date for the special meeting, 17,187,501 shares of Nebula Common Stock would be required to achieve a quorum.

Your shares will be counted towards the quorum only if you submit a valid proxy (or your broker, bank or other nominee submits one on your behalf) or if you vote in person at the special meeting of stockholders. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted towards the quorum requirement. If there is no quorum, a majority of the shares represented by stockholders present at the special meeting or by proxy may authorize adjournment of the special meeting to another date.

21

Morrow Sodali LLC

470 West Avenue

Stamford, CT 06902

Telephone: (800) 662-5200

Banks and brokers: (203) 658-9400

Email: NEBU.info@investor.morrowsodali.com

You may also contact Nebula at:

Nebula Acquisition Corp.

Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 2100

San Francisco, CA 94111

Telephone: (415) 780-9975

Attention: Adam H. Clammer, Chief Executive Officer

To obtain timely delivery, Nebula’s stockholders and warrantholders must request the materials no later than five business days prior to the special meeting.

You may also obtain additional information about Nebula from documents filed with the SEC by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information.”

The accompanying proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Nebula and Open Lending from documents that are not included in or delivered with the

22

accompanying proxy statement/prospectus. This information is available to you without charge upon your request. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference into the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus (other than certain exhibits or schedules to these documents) by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at the addresses and telephone numbers listed above. Requests made to Open Lending should be directed to the address and telephone number noted below:

Open Lending, LLC

Barton Oaks One, 901 S. MoPac Expressway, Bldg. 1, Suite 510

Austin, TX 78746

Telephone: (512) 892-0400

If you intend to seek redemption of your Public Shares, you will need to send a letter demanding redemption and deliver your stock (either physically or electronically) to Nebula’s transfer agent prior to 4:30 p.m., New York time, on the second business day prior to the special meeting of stockholders. If you have questions regarding the certification of your position or delivery of your stock, please contact:

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

6201 15^th Avenue

Brooklyn, New York 11219

Attention: Felix Orihuela

E-mail: FOrihuela@astfinancial.com

Questions and Answers about the Special Meeting of Warrantholders and the related proposals

The Warrant Amendment Proposal—to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve and adopt an amendment to the terms of the warrant agreement governing Nebula’s outstanding warrants to provide that, upon consummation of the Business Combination, each of the Public Warrants, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock, will be exchanged for cash in the amount of $1.50 per Public Warrant. The Warrant Amendment will be contingent upon Nebula’s stockholders approving the Business Combination and Nebula consummating the Business Combination; and

The Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal: to consider and vote upon a proposal to adjourn the special meeting of warrantholders to a later date or dates, if necessary or desirable, to permit further solicitation and vote of proxies, in the event that there are not sufficient votes to approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal.

23

The Public Warrants will not be amended unless the votes described above are obtained and the Business Combination is consummated. If you do not deliver your proxy card, or otherwise instruct your bank or broker to do so, such failure will have the same effect as a vote against the Warrant Amendment.

If the required votes are obtained, assuming the Business Combination is consummated, the proposed amendments to the Public Warrants will be binding on all of the holders of the Public Warrants, including warrantholders who did not vote to approve the Warrant Amendment.

The approval of the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the Public Warrants that are voted at the special meeting of warrantholders. Accordingly, a Nebula warrantholder’s failure to vote by proxy or to vote in person at the special meeting of warrantholders, an abstention from voting, or a broker non-vote will have no effect on the outcome of any vote on the Warrantholder Adjournment Proposal.

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information contained in this proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed under the heading “Forward-Looking Statements,” you should carefully consider the following risk factors in deciding how to vote on the proposals presented in this proxy statement/prospectus. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in these risk factors, alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may have a material adverse effect on the ParentCo business, reputation, revenue, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects, in which event the market price of ParentCo Common Stock could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment. Unless otherwise indicated, reference in this section and elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus to the Open Lending business being adversely affected, negatively impacted or harmed will include an adverse effect on, or a negative impact or harm to, the business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, revenue and future prospects of ParentCo.

Risks Related to Open Lending’s Business

Open Lending’s results of operations and continued growth depend on Open Lending’s ability to retain existing, and attract new, automotive lenders.

A substantial majority of Open Lending’s total revenue is generated from the transaction fees that it receives from its automotive lenders and the profit share that it receives from its insurance company partners in connection with loans made by automotive lenders to the owners or purchasers of used and new automobiles (the “Consumers”) using the Lenders Protection Program (the “LPP”). Approximately 5% of the average loan balance on each loan originated is collected by Open Lending as revenue in transaction fees, profit-sharing with insurance companies and administrative fees for claims administration services provided to the insurance companies. If automotive lenders cease to use LPP to make loans, Open Lending will fail to generate future revenues. To attract and retain automotive lenders, Open Lending markets LPP to automotive lenders on the basis of a number of factors, including loan analytics, risk-based pricing, risk modeling and automated decision-technology, as well as integration, customer service, brand and reputation. Automotive lenders are able to leverage the geographic diversity of the loans they can originate through LPP with the simplicity of Open Lending’s five-second all-inclusive loan offer generation. Automotive lenders, however, have alternative sources for internal loan generation, and they could elect to originate loans through those alternatives rather than through LPP.

There is significant competition for existing automotive lenders. If Open Lending fails to retain any automotive lenders, and does not acquire new automotive lenders of similar size and profitability, it would have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business and future growth. There has been some turnover in automotive lenders, as well as varying activation rates and volatility in usage of the Open Lending platform by automotive lenders, and this may continue or even increase in the future. Agreements with automotive lenders are cancellable on thirty days’ notice and do not require any minimum monthly level of application submissions. If a significant number of existing automotive lenders were to use other competing platforms, thereby reducing their use of LPP, it would have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business and results of operations.

A large percentage of revenue for Open Lending is concentrated with Open Lending’s top ten automotive lenders, and the loss of one or more significant automotive lenders could have a negative impact on operating results.

Open Lending’s top ten automotive lenders (including certain groups of affiliated automotive lenders) accounted for an aggregate of 49% and 42% of total loan origination amount in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Open Lending expects to have significant concentration in Open Lending’s largest automotive lender relationships for the foreseeable future. In the event that one or more of Open Lending’s significant automotive lenders, or groups of automotive lenders terminate their relationships with Open Lending, the number of loans originated through LPP would decline, which would materially adversely affect Open Lending’s business and, in turn, Open Lending’s revenue.

49

In 2020, Open Lending anticipates that its business will experience significant concentration as OEM Captives fully ramp and deploy LPP nationally across all of their new and used vehicle channels. The size and loan volume of OEM Captives is materially higher than any of Open Lending’s automotive lenders, which Open Lending believes will result in a high concentration of revenue being derived from a limited number of OEM Captives. As a result, if Open Lending was to lose an OEM Captive as one of its customers, this may have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s future revenues.

Open Lending’s results depend, to a significant extent, on the active and effective adoption of the Lenders Protection Program by automotive lenders.

Open Lending’s success depends on the active and effective adoption of the LPP by automotive lenders in originating loans to near-prime and non-prime borrowers. Open Lending relies on automotive lenders to utilize LPP within their loan origination systems. Although automotive lenders generally are under no obligation to use LPP in generating their loans, the integrated loan and insurance offering by LPP encourages the use of LPP by automotive lenders. The failure by automotive lenders to effectively adopt LPP would have a material adverse effect on the rate at which they can lend to near-prime and non-prime borrowers and in turn, would have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business, revenues and financial condition.

Open Lending has partnered with two major insurance carriers that underwrite and insure the loans generated using the LPP.

Open Lending primarily relies on AmTrust Financial Services (“AmTrust”), and CNA Financial Corp. (“CNA”), to insure the loans generated by the automotive lenders using LPP. Open Lending has entered into separate producer and claims service agreements with each of these carriers. The producer and claims service agreements with AmTrust and CNA generally contain customary termination provisions that allow them to terminate the agreement upon written notice after the occurrence of certain events including, among other things, breach of the producer agreement, Open Lending’s change of control without prior written consent of the insurance carrier, upon changes in regulatory requirements making the agreement unenforceable or for convenience. The Business Combination does not qualify as a change of control under either the AmTrust agreement or the CNA agreement. If either of these insurance carriers were to terminate their agreements with Open Lending and Open Lending is unable to replace the commitments of the terminating insurance carriers, it would have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business, operations and financial condition.

Open Lending’ financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by the impact of the global outbreak of the coronavirus.

Occurrences of epidemics or pandemics, depending on their scale, may cause different degrees of damage to the national and local economies within Open Lending’s geographic focus. Global economic conditions may be disrupted by widespread outbreaks of infectious or contagious diseases, and such disruption may adversely affect consumer demand for automobiles and automotive loans. For example, the deadly global outbreak and continuing spread of COVID-19 (also known as the novel coronavirus or coronavirus disease) could have an adverse effect on the value, operating results and financial condition of Open Lending’s business, as well as the ability of Open Lending to grow the revenue that it generates with automotive lenders and insurance company partners. In addition, the impact of COVID-19 is likely to cause substantial changes in consumer behavior and has caused restrictions on business and individual activities, which are likely to lead to reduced economic activity. Extraordinary actions taken by international, federal, state, and local public health and governmental authorities to contain and combat the outbreak and spread of COVID-19 in regions throughout the world, including travel bans, quarantines, “stay-at-home” orders, and similar mandates for many individuals and businesses to substantially restrict daily activities could have an adverse effect on Open Lending’s financial condition and results of operations.

The economic slowdown attributable to COVID-19 has led to a global decrease in vehicle sales in markets around the world. Any sustained decline in vehicle sales would have a substantial adverse effect on Open

50

Lending’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. Moreover, as a result of the restrictions described above and consumers’ reaction to COVID-19 in general, showroom traffic at car dealers has dropped significantly and many dealers have temporarily ceased operations, thereby reducing the demand for Open Lending’s products and leading dealers to purchase fewer vehicles. In the event there are extended closures of businesses, furloughs or the suspension of employees from businesses or other developments that reduce the earnings of workers, these developments may negatively impact the ability of consumers to pay their automotive loans, which may lead to higher loan defaults and increased losses for Open Lending’s insurance company partners. Increased losses would result in lower profit share earnings on Open Lending’s existing insured loan portfolio.

Open Lending’s results following the Business Combination may be materially different from those shown in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information presented in this proxy statement/prospectus. In particular, following the date that Open Lending entered into the Business Combination, there has been an outbreak and global spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of the pandemic, Open Lending may experience reduction in its results from operations, and is unable at this time to estimate the extent of the effect of COVID-19 on its business. The effects of COVID-19 on Open Lending’s business were not taken into account by Open Lending when prior to entering into the Business Combination. No assurances can be made regarding future events or that the assumptions made by Open Lending prior to entering into the Business Combination will accurately reflect future conditions, and actual results will likely differ, and may differ materially.

The extent and duration of the economic slowdown attributable to COVID-19 remains uncertain at this time. A continued significant economic slowdown could have a substantial adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations. If these conditions persist for an extended term, it could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s future revenue and net income.

Open Lending has experienced rapid growth, which may be difficult to sustain and which may place significant demands on its operational, administrative and financial resources.

Open Lending’s approximately 50% year-over-year growth has caused significant demands on its operational, marketing, compliance and accounting infrastructure, and has resulted in increased expenses, which Open Lending expects to continue as it grows. In addition, Open Lending is required to continuously develop and adapt its systems and infrastructure in response to the increasing sophistication of the consumer finance market and regulatory developments relating to existing and projected business activities and those of automotive lenders. Open Lending’s future growth will depend, among other things, on its ability to maintain an operating platform and management system sufficient to address growth and will require Open Lending to incur significant additional expenses and to commit additional senior management and operational resources.

As a result of Open Lending’s growth, they face significant challenges in:

51

Open Lending may not be able to manage expanding operations effectively, and any failure to do so could adversely affect the ability to generate revenue and control expenses.

If Open Lending experiences negative publicity, it may lose the confidence of automotive lenders and insurance carriers who use or partner with the LPP and Open Lending’s business may suffer.

Reputational risk, or the risk to negative publicity or public opinion, is inherent to Open Lending’s business. Recently, consumer financial services companies have been experiencing increased reputational harm as consumers and regulators take issue with certain of their practices and judgments, including, for example, fair lending, credit reporting accuracy, lending to members of the military, state licensing (for lenders, servicers and money transmitters) and debt collection. Given that Open Lending’s primary clients are automotive lenders in the customer financial services space, any reputational risk associated with clients is in turn attributable to Open Lending. Maintaining a positive reputation is critical to Open Lending’s ability to attract and retain existing and new automotive lenders, insurance carriers, investors and employees. Negative public opinion can arise from many sources, including actual or alleged misconduct, errors or improper business practices by employees, automotive lenders, insurance carriers, automobile dealers, outsourced service providers or other counterparties; litigation or regulatory actions; failure by Open Lending, automotive lenders, or automobile dealers to meet minimum standards of service and quality; inadequate protection of consumer information; failure of automotive lenders to adhere to the terms of their LPP agreements or other contractual arrangements or standards; failure of insurance carriers and Open Lending’s subsidiary, Insurance Administrative Services LLC, to satisfactorily administer claims; compliance failures; and media coverage, whether accurate or not. Negative public opinion can diminish the value of the Open Lending brand and adversely affect Open Lending’s ability to attract and retain automotive lenders and insurance carriers as a result of which Open Lending’s results of operations may be materially harmed and it could be exposed to litigation and regulatory action.

Privacy concerns or security breaches relating to the LPP could result in economic loss, damage Open Lending’s reputation, deter users from using Open Lending products, and expose Open Lending to legal penalties and liability.

Through the use of LLP, Open Lending gathers and stores personally identifiable information on Consumers such as social security numbers, names and addresses. A cybersecurity breach where this information was stolen or made public would result in negative publicity and additional costs to mitigate the damage to customers. While Open Lending has taken reasonable steps to protect such data, techniques used to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems, are constantly evolving, and Open Lending may be unable to anticipate such techniques or implement adequate preventative measures to avoid unauthorized access or other adverse impacts to such data or Open Lending systems.

The LPP is vulnerable to software bugs, computer viruses, internet worms, break-ins, phishing attacks, attempts to overload servers with denial-of-service, or other attacks or similar disruptions, any of which could lead to system interruptions, delays, or shutdowns, causing loss of critical data or the unauthorized access of data. Computer malware, viruses, and computer hacking and phishing attacks have become more prevalent in Open Lending’s industry. Functions that facilitate interactivity with other internet platforms could increase the scope of access of hackers to user accounts. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of

52

Open Lending products to the satisfaction of Open Lending’s clients and their patients may harm Open Lending’s reputation and Open Lending’s ability to retain existing clients. Although Open Lending has in place systems and processes that are designed to protect data, prevent data loss, disable undesirable accounts and activities and prevent or detect security breaches, Open Lending cannot assure you that such measures will provide absolute security. If an actual or perceived breach of security occurs to Open Lending’s systems or a third party’s systems, Open Lending also could be required to expend significant resources to mitigate the breach of security and to address matters related to any such breach, including notifying users or regulators.

Changes in market interest rates could have an adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

The fixed interest rates charged on the loans that automotive lenders originate are calculated based upon market benchmarks at the time of origination. Increases in the market benchmark would result in increases in the interest rates on new loans. Increased interest rates may adversely impact the spending levels of Consumers and their ability and willingness to borrow money. Higher interest rates often lead to higher rates charged to the Consumer, which could negatively impact the ability of automotive lenders to generate volume and in turn, Open Lending’s ability to generate revenues on loans originated using the LPP. Higher interest rates may also increase the payment obligations of Consumers, which may reduce the ability of Consumers to remain current on their obligations to automotive lenders and, therefore, lead to increased delinquencies, defaults, Consumer bankruptcies and charge-offs, and decreasing recoveries, all of which could have an adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

The loss of the services of Open Lending’s senior management could adversely affect Open Lending’s business.

The experience of Open Lending’s senior management is a valuable asset to Open Lending. Open Lending’s management team has significant experience in the consumer loan business, is responsible for many of Open Lending’s core competencies and would be difficult to replace. Competition for senior executives in customer lending industry is intense, and Open Lending may not be able to attract and retain qualified personnel to replace or succeed members of Open Lending’s senior management team or other key personnel. Failure to retain talented senior leadership could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

Open Lending’s projections are subject to significant risks, assumptions, estimates and uncertainties. As a result, Open Lending’s projected revenues, market share, expenses and profitability may differ materially from our expectations.

Open Lending operates in a rapidly changing and competitive industry and Open Lending’s projections will be subject to the risks and assumptions made by management with respect to its industry. Operating results are difficult to forecast because they generally depend on a number of factors, including the competition Open Lending faces, its ability to attract and retain automotive lenders, the active and effective adoption of the LPP by automotive lenders in originating loans to near-prime and non-prime borrowers, Open Lending’s profit share assumptions and general industry trends. Additionally, as described under “— Open Lending’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of automotive lenders,” Open Lending’s business may be affected by reductions in consumer spending from time to time as a result of a number of factors which may be difficult to predict. This may result in decreased revenue levels, and Open Lending may be unable to adopt measures in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected shortfall in income. This inability could cause Open Lending’s operating results in a given quarter to be higher or lower than expected. If actual results differ from Open Lending’s estimates, analysts may negatively react and the Combined Company’s stock price could be materially impacted.

53

Open Lending’s vendor relationships subject Open Lending to a variety of risks, and the failure of third parties to comply with legal or regulatory requirements or to provide various services that are important to Open Lending’s operations could have an adverse effect on its business.

Open Lending has significant vendors that, among other things, provide Open Lending with financial, technology, insurance and other services to support its loan protection services, including access to credit reports and information. Under various legal theories and contractual requirements, companies may be held responsible for the actions of their subcontractors. Accordingly, Open Lending could be adversely impacted to the extent that Open Lending’s vendors fail to comply with the legal requirements applicable to the particular products or services being offered.

In some cases, third-party vendors, including resellers and aggregators, are the sole source, or one of a limited number of sources, of the services they provide to Open Lending. Certain of Open Lending’s vendor agreements are terminable on little or no notice, and if current vendors were to stop providing services to Open Lending on acceptable terms, Open Lending may be unable to procure alternatives from other vendors in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms (or at all). For example, Open Lending currently utilizes a single vendor to provide all consumer credit reports insurance carriers use for insurance underwriting. If this vendor were to stop providing consumer credit report services to Open Lending on acceptable terms, Open Lending would need to procure alternative consumer credit reporting services from another third-party provider in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms. If any third-party vendor fails to provide the services Open Lending requires, fails to meet contractual requirements (including compliance with applicable laws and regulations), fails to maintain adequate data privacy and electronic security systems, or suffers a cyber-attack or other security breach, Open Lending could be subject to regulatory enforcement actions and suffer economic and reputational harm that could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business. Further, Open Lending may incur significant costs to resolve any such disruptions in service, which could adversely affect Open Lending’s business.

Litigation, regulatory actions and compliance issues could subject Open Lending to significant fines, penalties, judgments, remediation costs and/or requirements resulting in increased expenses.

Open Lending’s business is subject to increased risks of litigation and regulatory actions as a result of a number of factors and from various sources, including as a result of the highly regulated nature of the financial services industry, insurance carriers and the focus of state and federal enforcement agencies on the financial services industry and insurance carriers.

From time to time, Open Lending is also involved in, or the subject of, reviews, requests for information, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by state and federal governmental agencies, including insurance regulators, the Department of Insurance of many states (“DOIs”), regarding Open Lending’s business activities and Open Lending’s qualifications to conduct its business in certain jurisdictions, which could subject Open Lending to significant fines, penalties, obligations to change its business practices and other requirements resulting in increased expenses and diminished earnings. Open Lending’s involvement in any such matter also could cause significant harm to its reputation and divert management attention from the operation of its business, even if the matters are ultimately determined in Open Lending’s favor. Moreover, any settlement, or any consent order or adverse judgment in connection with any formal or informal proceeding or investigation by a government agency, may prompt litigation or additional investigations or proceedings as other litigants or other government agencies begin independent reviews of the same activities.

In addition, a number of participants in the consumer finance industry have been the subject of putative class action lawsuits; state attorney general actions and other state regulatory actions; federal regulatory enforcement actions, including actions relating to alleged unfair, deceptive or abusive acts or practices; violations of state licensing and lending laws, including state usury laws; actions alleging discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender or other prohibited bases; and allegations of noncompliance with various state and federal

54

laws and regulations relating to originating and servicing consumer finance loans. The current regulatory environment, increased regulatory compliance efforts and enhanced regulatory enforcement have resulted in significant operational and compliance costs and may prevent Open Lending from providing certain products and services. There is no assurance that these regulatory matters or other factors will not, in the future, affect how Open Lending conducts its business and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on its business. In particular, legal proceedings brought under state consumer protection statutes or under several of the various federal consumer financial services statutes may result in a separate fine for each violation of the statute, which, particularly in the case of class action lawsuits, could result in damages substantially in excess of the amounts Open Lending earned from the underlying activities. Similar risks exist for insurance producing and claims administration services, which are highly regulated.

In addition, from time to time, through Open Lending’s operational and compliance controls, Open Lending identifies compliance issues that require it to make operational changes and, depending on the nature of the issue, result in financial remediation to impacted customers. These self-identified issues and voluntary remediation payments could be significant, depending on the issue and the number of customers impacted, and also could generate litigation or regulatory investigations that subject Open Lending to additional risk.

Fraudulent activity could negatively impact the Open Lending business and could cause automotive lenders to be less willing to originate loans or insurance carriers to be less willing to underwrite policies as part of the Lenders Protection Program.

Fraud is prevalent in the financial services industry and is likely to increase as perpetrators become more sophisticated. Open Lending is subject to the risk of fraudulent activity with respect to the underwriting policies of insurance carriers, automotive lenders, their customers and third parties handling customer information. Open Lending’s resources, technologies and fraud prevention tools may be insufficient to accurately detect and prevent fraud. The level of Open Lending’s fraud charge-offs could increase and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if fraudulent activity were to significantly increase. High profile fraudulent activity also could negatively impact the Open Lending brand and reputation, which could negatively impact the use of Open Lending’s services and products. In addition, significant increases in fraudulent activity could lead to regulatory intervention, which could increase Open Lending’s costs and also negatively impact its business.

Cyber-attacks and other security breaches could have an adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

In the normal course of Open Lending’s business, Open Lending collects, processes and retains sensitive and confidential information regarding automotive lenders, insurance carriers and Consumers. Open Lending also has arrangements in place with certain third-party service providers that require Open Lending to share Consumer information. Although Open Lending devotes significant resources and management focus to ensuring the integrity of its systems through information security and business continuity programs, the Open Lending facilities and systems, and those of automotive lenders, insurance carriers and third-party service providers, are vulnerable to external or internal security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming or human errors, and other similar events. Open Lending, automotive lenders, insurance carriers and third-party service providers have experienced all of these events in the past and expect to continue to experience them in the future. Open Lending also faces security threats from malicious third parties that could obtain unauthorized access to Open Lending systems and networks, which threats it anticipates will continue to grow in scope and complexity over time. These events could interrupt the Open Lending business or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, damage to its reputation and a loss of confidence in the security of Open Lending’s systems, products and services. Although the impact to date from these events has not had a material adverse effect on Open Lending, no assurance is given that this will be the case in the future.

Information security risks in the financial services industry have increased recently, in part because of new technologies, the use of the internet and telecommunications technologies (including mobile devices) to conduct

55

financial and other business transactions and the increased sophistication and activities of organized criminals, perpetrators of fraud, hackers, terrorists and others. In addition to cyber-attacks and other security breaches involving the theft of sensitive and confidential information, hackers recently have engaged in attacks that are designed to disrupt key business services, such as consumer-facing websites. Open Lending and automotive lenders may not be able to anticipate or implement effective preventive measures against all security breaches of these types, especially because the techniques used change frequently and because attacks can originate from a wide variety of sources. Open Lending employs detection and response mechanisms designed to contain and mitigate security incidents. Nonetheless, early detection efforts may be thwarted by sophisticated attacks and malware designed to avoid detection. Open Lending also may fail to detect the existence of a security breach related to the information of automotive lenders, insurance carriers and Consumers that Open Lending retains as part of its business and may be unable to prevent unauthorized access to that information.

Open Lending also faces risks related to cyber-attacks and other security breaches that typically involve the transmission of sensitive information regarding borrowers through various third parties, including automotive lenders, insurance carriers and data processors. Some of these parties have in the past been the target of security breaches and cyber-attacks. Because Open Lending does not control these third parties or oversee the security of their systems, future security breaches or cyber-attacks affecting any of these third parties could impact Open Lending through no fault of its own, and in some cases Open Lending may have exposure and suffer losses for breaches or attacks relating to them. While Open Lending regularly conduct security assessments of significant third-party service providers, no assurance is given that Open Lending’s third-party information security protocols are sufficient to withstand a cyber-attack or other security breach.

The access by unauthorized persons to, or the improper disclosure by Open Lending of, confidential information regarding LPP customers or Open Lending’s proprietary information, software, methodologies and business secrets could interrupt the Open Lending business or operations, result in significant legal and financial exposure, supervisory liability, damage to its reputation or a loss of confidence in the security of Open Lending’s systems, products and services, all of which could have a material adverse impact on Open Lending’s business. In addition, there recently have been a number of well-publicized attacks or breaches affecting companies in the financial services industry that have heightened concern by consumers, which could also intensify regulatory focus, cause users to lose trust in the security of the industry in general and result in reduced use of Open Lending services and increased costs, all of which could also have a material adverse effect on the Open Lending business.

Disruptions in the operation of Open Lending’s computer systems and third-party data centers could have an adverse effect on the Open Lending business.

Open Lending’s ability to deliver products and services to automotive lenders, service loans made by automotive lenders and otherwise operate Open Lending’s business and comply with applicable laws depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of the Open Lending computer systems and third-party data centers, as well as those of automotive lenders and third-party service providers.

These computer systems and third-party data centers may encounter service interruptions at any time due to system or software failure, natural disasters, severe weather conditions, health pandemics, terrorist attacks, cyber-attacks or other events. Any of such catastrophes could have a negative effect on the Open Lending business and technology infrastructure (including its computer network systems), on automotive lenders and insurance carriers and on Consumers. Catastrophic events also could prevent or make it more difficult for Consumers to travel to automobile dealers’ locations to shop, thereby negatively impacting Consumer spending in the affected regions (or in severe cases, nationally), and could interrupt or disable local or national communications networks, including the payment systems network, which could prevent Consumers from making purchases or payments (temporarily or over an extended period). These events also could impair the ability of third parties to provide critical services to Open Lending. All of these adverse effects of catastrophic events could result in a decrease in the use of Open Lending’s solution and payments to Open Lending, which could have a material adverse effect on the Open Lending business.

56

In addition, the implementation of technology changes and upgrades to maintain current and integrate new systems may cause service interruptions, transaction processing errors or system conversion delays and may cause Open Lending to fail to comply with applicable laws, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Open Lending business. Open Lending expects that new technologies and business processes applicable to the consumer financial services industry will continue to emerge and that these new technologies and business processes may be better than those Open Lending currently uses. There is no assurance that Open Lending will be able to successfully adopt new technology as critical systems and applications become obsolete and better ones become available. A failure to maintain and/or improve current technology and business processes could cause disruptions in Open Lending’s operations or cause its solution to be less competitive, all of which could have a material adverse effect on its business.

If the underwriting models Open Lending uses contain errors or are otherwise ineffective, Open Lending’s reputation and relationships with automotive lenders and insurance carriers could be harmed.

Open Lending’s ability to attract automotive lenders to LPP is significantly dependent on Open Lending’s ability to effectively evaluate a Consumer’s credit profile and likelihood of default and potential loss in accordance with automotive lenders’ and insurance carriers’ underwriting policies. Open Lending’s business depends significantly on the accuracy and success of its underwriting model. To conduct this evaluation, Open Lending uses proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models. If any of the credit decisioning and scoring models Open Lending uses contains programming or other errors, is ineffective or the data provided by Consumers or third parties is incorrect or stale, or if Open Lending is unable to obtain accurate data from Consumers or third parties (such as credit reporting agencies), the Open Lending loan pricing and approval process could be negatively affected, resulting in mispriced or misclassified loans or incorrect approvals or denials of loans. This could damage Open Lending’s reputation and relationships with automotive lenders and insurance carriers, which could have a material adverse effect on the Open Lending business.

Open Lending depends on the accuracy and completeness of information about Consumers, and any misrepresented information could adversely affect Open Lending’s business.

In evaluating loan applicants, Open Lending relies on information furnished to Open Lending by or on behalf of Consumers, including credit, identification, employment and other relevant information. Some of the information regarding Consumers provided to Open Lending is used in its proprietary credit decisioning and scoring models, which Open Lending uses to determine whether an application meets the applicable underwriting criteria. Open Lending relies on the accuracy and completeness of that information.

Not all Consumer information is independently verified. As a result, Open Lending relies on the accuracy and completeness of the information provided by Consumers or indirectly by automotive lenders. If any of the information that is considered in the loan review process is inaccurate, whether intentional or not, and such inaccuracy is not detected prior to loan funding, the loan may have a greater risk of default than expected. Additionally, there is a risk that, following the date of the credit report that Open Lending obtains and reviews, a Consumer may have defaulted on, or become delinquent in the payment of, a pre-existing debt obligation, taken on additional debt, lost his or her job or other sources of income, or experienced other adverse financial events. Any significant increase in inaccuracies or resulting increases in losses would adversely affect Open Lending’s business.

Open Lending relies extensively on models in managing many aspects of Open Lending business. Any inaccuracies or errors in Open Lending’s models could have an adverse effect on the Open Lending business.

In assisting automotive lenders with the design of the products that are offered on LPP, Open Lending makes assumptions about various matters, including repayment timing and default rates, and then utilize of proprietary underwriting modeling to analyze and forecast the performance and profitability of the loans. Open Lending’s assumptions may be inaccurate and models may not be as predictive as expected for many reasons,

57

including that they often involve matters that are inherently difficult to predict and beyond Open Lending’s control (e.g., macroeconomic conditions) and that they often involve complex interactions between a number of dependent and independent variables and factors. Any significant inaccuracies or errors in assumptions could impact the profitability of the products to automotive lenders, as well as the profitability of Open Lending’s business, could result in Open Lending’s underestimating potential losses and overstating potential automotive lender returns.

If assumptions or estimates Open Lending uses in preparing financial statements are incorrect or are required to change, Open Lending’s reported results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Open Lending is required to make various assumptions and estimates in preparing its financial statements under GAAP, including for purposes of determining finance charge reversals, share-based compensation, asset impairment, reserves related to litigation and other legal matters, and other regulatory exposures and the amounts recorded for certain contractual payments to be paid to, or received from, Open Lending’s merchants and others under contractual arrangements. In addition, significant assumptions and estimates are involved in determining certain disclosures required under GAAP, including those involving fair value measurements. If the assumptions or estimates underlying Open Lending’s financial statements are incorrect, the actual amounts realized on transactions and balances subject to those estimates will be different, which could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

The consumer lending industry is highly competitive and is likely to become more competitive, and Open Lending’s inability to compete successfully or maintain or improve Open Lending’s market share and margins could adversely affect its business.

Open Lending’s success depends on Open Lending’s ability to generate usage of LPP. The consumer lending industry is highly competitive and increasingly dynamic as emerging technologies continue to enter the marketplace. Technological advances and heightened e-commerce activities have increased consumers’ accessibility to products and services, which has intensified the desirability of offering loans to consumers through digital-based solutions. Open Lending faces competition in areas such as compliance capabilities, financing terms, promotional offerings, fees, approval rates, speed and simplicity of loan origination, ease-of-use, marketing expertise, service levels, products and services, technological capabilities and integration, customer service, brand and reputation. Open Lending’s existing and potential competitors may decide to modify their pricing and business models to compete more directly with Open Lending’s model. Any reduction in usage of LPP, or a reduction in the lifetime profitability of loans under LPP in an effort to attract or retain business, could reduce Open Lending’s revenues and earnings. If Open Lending is unable to compete effectively for customer usage, its business could be materially adversely affected.

Open Lending’s revenue is impacted, to a significant extent, by the general economy and the financial performance of automotive lenders.

Open Lending’s business, the consumer financial services industry and automotive lenders’ businesses are sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Economic factors such as interest rates, changes in monetary and related policies, market volatility, consumer confidence and unemployment rates are among the most significant factors that impact consumer spending behavior. Weak economic conditions or a significant deterioration in economic conditions reduce the amount of disposable income consumers have, which in turn reduces consumer spending and the willingness of qualified borrowers to take out loans. Such conditions are also likely to affect the ability and willingness of borrowers to pay amounts owed to automotive lenders, each of which would have a material adverse effect on its business.

General economic conditions and the willingness of lenders to deploy capital impacts Open Lending’s performance. The generation of new loans through LPP, and the transaction fees and other fee income to Open Lending associated with such loans, is dependent upon sales of automobiles by dealers. Dealers’ sales may

58

decrease or fail to increase as a result of factors outside of their control, such as the macroeconomic conditions referenced above, or business conditions affecting a particular automobile dealer, industry vertical or region. Weak economic conditions also could extend the length of dealers’ sales cycle and cause customers to delay making (or not make) purchases of automobiles. The decline of sales by dealers for any reason will generally result in lower credit sales and, therefore, lower loan volume and associated fee income for automotive lenders, and therefore, to us. This risk is particularly acute with respect to the largest automobile dealers associated with automotive lenders that account for a significant amount of Open Lending platform revenue.

In addition, if an automobile dealer or automotive lender closes some or all of its locations or becomes subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy proceeding (or if there is a perception that it may become subject to a bankruptcy proceeding), LPP borrowers may have less incentive to pay their outstanding balances to automotive lenders, which could result in higher charge-off rates than anticipated.

Weakening economic conditions, in particular increases in unemployment, will lead to increased defaults and insurance claim payments, resulting in higher losses for insurance carriers. Increased claim payments may affect the willingness of insurance carriers to provide default insurance. In the event insurer losses cause one of insurance carriers to cease providing insurance, it would have a material adverse effect on Open Lending operations and financial results.

Because Open Lending’s business is heavily concentrated on consumer lending in the U.S. automobile industry, Open Lending’s results are more susceptible to fluctuations in that market than the results of a more diversified company would be.

Open Lending’s business currently is concentrated on supporting consumer lending in the U.S. automobile industry. As a result, Open Lending is more susceptible to fluctuations and risks particular to U.S. consumer credit than a more diversified company would be as well as to factors that may drive the demand for automobiles, such as sales levels of new automobiles and the aging of existing inventory. Open Lending is also more susceptible to the risks of increased regulations and legal and other regulatory actions that are targeted at consumer credit, the specific consumer credit products that automotive lenders offer (including promotional financing). Open Lending’s business concentration could have an adverse effect on its business.

Open Lending is, and intends in the future to continue, expanding into relationships with new lending partners, including the OEM Captive space, and Open Lending’s failure to comply with applicable regulations, or accurately predict demand or growth, in those new industries could have an adverse effect on its business.

Open Lending recently expanded into and is penetrating the OEM Captive space. Open Lending believes that all automobile manufacturers have an OEM Captive or related party finance company relationship. One of the primary goals of an OEM Captive is to support automobile sales of the dealers, particularly with respect to new vehicle sales. Open Lending believes that the OEM Captive is generally the preferred lender of the OEM dealer network. Relative to traditional credit union and bank automotive lenders, OEM Captives represent a larger loan volume and therefore, larger revenue opportunity for Open Lending. Open Lending makes no assurance that it will achieve similar levels of success, if any, with OEM Captives as with other credit unions and regional automotive lenders, and may face unanticipated challenges in its ability to offer LPP to OEM Captives. In addition, the OEM Captive space is highly regulated and Open Lending, OEM Captives and other automotive lenders, as applicable, are subject to substantial regulatory requirements, including privacy laws. Open Lending has limited experience in managing these risks and the compliance requirements attendant to such regulatory requirements. The costs of compliance and any failure by Open Lending, OEM Captives or other automotive lenders, as applicable, to comply with such regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business. Any failure by Open Lending to grow its relationships with these new lending partners could have a materially adverse impact on its business.

59

Open Lending may in the future expand to new industry verticals outside of the automotive industry, and failure to comply with applicable regulations, or accurately predict demand or growth, in those new industries could have an adverse effect on the Open Lending business.

Open Lending may in the future further expand into other industry verticals. There is no assurance that Open Lending will be able to successfully develop consumer financing products and services for these new industries. Open Lending’s investment of resources to develop consumer financing products and services for the new industries it enters may either be insufficient or result in expenses that are excessive in light of loans actually originated by lenders in those industries. Additionally, Open Lending’s nearly 20 years of experience is in the automotive lending industry and therefore, industry participants in new industry verticals may not be receptive to its financing solutions and Open Lending may face competitors with more experience and resources. The borrower profile of Consumers in new verticals may not be as attractive, in terms of average FICO scores or other attributes, as in current verticals, which may lead to higher levels of delinquencies or defaults than Open Lending has historically experienced. Industries change rapidly, and Open Lending makes no assurance that it will be able to accurately forecast demand (or the lack thereof) for a solution or that those industries will be receptive to Open Lending’s product offerings. Failure to predict demand or growth accurately in new industries could have a materially adverse impact on Open Lending’s business.

Open Lending’s business would suffer if it fails to attract and retain highly skilled employees.

Open Lending’s future success will depend on its ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate and retain highly qualified personnel for all areas of its organization, particularly information technology and sales. Trained and experienced personnel are in high demand and may be in short supply. Many of the companies with which Open Lending competes for experienced employees have greater resources than Open Lending does and may be able to offer more attractive terms of employment. In addition, Open Lending invests significant time and expense in training employees, which increases their value to competitors that may seek to recruit them. Open Lending may not be able to attract, develop and maintain the skilled workforce necessary to operate its business, and labor expenses may increase as a result of a shortage in the supply of qualified personnel, which will negatively impact Open Lending’s business.

The Credit Agreement that governs Open Lending’s term loan contains various covenants that could limit its ability to engage in activities that may be in Open Lending’s best long-term interests.

Open Lending has a term loan outstanding in the original principal amount of $170,000,000 (the “Term Loan”), that was incurred under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of March 11, 2020, among Open Lending, UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as administrative agent, the lenders from time to time party thereto and the other parties thereto, as amended, the Credit Agreement. The proceeds of the Term Loan will be used to, among other things, finance a distribution to its equity investors prior to the consummation of the Business Combination. The Term Loan bears interest at a variable rate of LIBOR + 6.50% or the base rate + 5.50%. The obligations of Open Lending under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by all of its subsidiaries and secured by substantially all of the assets of Open Lending and its subsidiaries, in each case, subject to certain customary exceptions. The Term Loan has a maturity date of March 11, 2027. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement, Open Lending may be required to make certain mandatory prepayments prior to maturity. Voluntary prepayments and certain mandatory prepayments may be subject to certain prepayment premiums in the first 2 years after the date thereof.

The Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants customarily applicable to senior secured credit facilities, including, among other things, customary limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness and liens, certain intercompany transactions and other investments, dispositions of assets, issuance of certain unit, repayment of other indebtedness, redemptions of units and payment of dividends. The Credit Agreement also contains a maximum total net leverage ratio financial covenant that is tested quarterly and calculated based on the ratio of our adjusted EBITDA to funded indebtedness. The maximum total net leverage ratio begins at 4.75 to 1 and then

60

gradually decreases from year-to-year down to 2.5 to 1.0 on or after June 30, 2026. The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including subject to thresholds and grace periods, among others, payment default, covenant default, cross default to other material indebtedness, and judgment defaults.

Open Lending’s ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond its control, such as market fluctuations impacting net income. Breaches of these covenants will result in a default under the Credit Agreement, subject to any applicable cure rights, in which case the administrative agent may accelerate the outstanding Term Loan.

If such acceleration under the Credit Agreement occurs, Open Lending’s ability to fund its operations could be seriously harmed.

Open Lending may be unable to sufficiently protect its proprietary rights and may encounter disputes from time to time relating to its use of the intellectual property of third parties.

Open Lending relies on a combination of trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets, domain names and agreements with employees and third parties to protect its proprietary rights. Open Lending has trademark and service mark registrations and pending applications for additional registrations in the United States. Open Lending also owns the domain name rights for Openlending.com, Openlending.net, Openlending.us, Dev-openlending.com, Lendersprotection.org, Lendersprotection.us, Len-pro.org, Lend-pro.us, Lend-pro.net, Lendpro.net, Lendpro.org, Lendpro.us, Lend-pro.com, Lendersprotection.com, Dynamicdecisioning.com, Dynamicdecisioning.net, Lendersdecision.com, Lendersdecision.net, Lend-analytics.com, Lend-analytics.net, Lendanalytics.com, Lendanalytics.net, Olanalytics.com, Olanalytics.net, Sayyestomoreloans.com, Sayyestomoreloans.net, as well as other words and phrases important to the Open Lending business. Nonetheless, third parties may challenge, invalidate or circumvent Open Lending’s intellectual property, and Open Lending’s intellectual property may not be sufficient to provide it with a competitive advantage.

Despite Open Lending’s efforts to protect these rights, unauthorized third parties may attempt to duplicate or copy the proprietary aspects of its technology and processes. Open Lending’s competitors and other third parties independently may design around or develop similar technology or otherwise duplicate Open Lending’s services or products such that Open Lending could not assert its intellectual property rights against them. In addition, Open Lending’s contractual arrangements may not effectively prevent disclosure of its intellectual property and confidential and proprietary information or provide an adequate remedy in the event of an unauthorized disclosure. Measures in place may not prevent misappropriation or infringement of Open Lending’s intellectual property or proprietary information and the resulting loss of competitive advantage, and Open Lending may be required to litigate to protect its intellectual property and proprietary information from misappropriation or infringement by others, which is expensive, could cause a diversion of resources and may not be successful.

Open Lending also may encounter disputes from time to time concerning intellectual property rights of others, and it may not prevail in these disputes. Third parties may raise claims against Open Lending alleging that Open Lending, or consultants or other third parties retained or indemnified by Open Lending, infringe on their intellectual property rights. Some third-party intellectual property rights may be extremely broad, and it may not be possible for Open Lending to conduct its operations in such a way as to avoid all alleged violations of such intellectual property rights. Given the complex, rapidly changing and competitive technological and business environment in which Open Lending operates, and the potential risks and uncertainties of intellectual property-related litigation, an assertion of an infringement claim against Open Lending may cause Open Lending to spend significant amounts to defend the claim, even if Open Lending ultimately prevails, pays significant money damages, loses significant revenues, be prohibited from using the relevant systems, processes, technologies or other intellectual property (temporarily or permanently), ceases offering certain products or services, or incurs significant license, royalty or technology development expenses.

61

Moreover, it has become common in recent years for individuals and groups to purchase intellectual property assets for the sole purpose of making claims of infringement and attempting to extract settlements from companies such as Open Lending’s. Even in instances where Open Lending believes that claims and allegations of intellectual property infringement against it are without merit, defending against such claims is time consuming and expensive and could result in the diversion of time and attention of Open Lending’s management and employees. In addition, although in some cases a third party may have agreed to indemnify Open Lending for such costs, such indemnifying party may refuse or be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. In other cases, insurance may not cover potential claims of this type adequately or at all, and Open Lending may be required to pay monetary damages, which may be significant.

Open Lending’s risk management processes and procedures may not be effective.

Open Lending’s risk management processes and procedures seek to appropriately balance risk and return and mitigate risks. Open Lending has established processes and procedures intended to identify, measure, monitor and control the types of risk to which Open Lending and automotive lenders are subject, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, strategic risk and operational risk. Credit risk is the risk of loss that arises when an obligor fails to meet the terms of an obligation. Market risk is the risk of loss due to changes in external market factors such as interest rates. Liquidity risk is the risk that financial condition or overall safety and soundness are adversely affected by an inability, or perceived inability, to meet obligations and support business growth. Strategic risk is the risk from changes in the business environment, improper implementation of decisions or inadequate responsiveness to changes in the business environment. Operational risk is the risk of loss arising from inadequate or failed processes, people or systems, external events (e.g., natural disasters), compliance, reputational or legal matters and includes those risks as they relate directly to Open Lending as well as to third parties with whom Open Lending contract or otherwise do business.

Management of Open Lending risks depends, in part, upon the use of analytical and forecasting models. If these models are ineffective at predicting future losses or are otherwise inadequate, Open Lending may incur unexpected losses or otherwise be adversely affected. In addition, the information Open Lending uses in managing its credit and other risks may be inaccurate or incomplete as a result of error or fraud, both of which may be difficult to detect and avoid. There also may be risks that exist, or that develop in the future, that Open Lending have not appropriately anticipated, identified or mitigated, including when processes are changed or new products and services are introduced. If Open Lending’s risk management framework does not effectively identify and control its risks, Open Lending could suffer unexpected losses or be adversely affected, which could have a material adverse effect on its business.

Some aspects of Open Lending’s platform include open source software, and any failure to comply with the terms of one or more of these open source licenses could negatively affect its business.

Aspects of Open Lending’s platform include software covered by open source licenses. The terms of various open source licenses have not been interpreted by United States courts, and there is a risk that such licenses could be construed in a manner that imposes unanticipated conditions or restrictions on Open Lending’s platform. If portions of Open Lending’s proprietary software are determined to be subject to an open source license, Open Lending could be required to publicly release the affected portions of source code, re-engineer all or a portion of its technologies or otherwise be limited in the licensing of technologies, each of which could reduce or eliminate the value of Open Lending’s technologies and loan products. In addition to risks related to license requirements, usage of open source software can lead to greater risks than use of third-party commercial software because open source licensors generally do not provide warranties or controls on the origin of the software. Many of the risks associated with the use of open source software cannot be eliminated and could adversely affect the Open Lending business.

62

To the extent that Open Lending seeks to grow through future acquisitions, or other strategic investments or alliances, Open Lending may not be able to do so effectively.

Open Lending may in the future seek to grow its business by exploring potential acquisitions or other strategic investments or alliances. Open Lending may not be successful in identifying businesses or opportunities that meet its acquisition or expansion criteria. In addition, even if a potential acquisition target or other strategic investment is identified, Open Lending may not be successful in completing such acquisition or integrating such new business or other investment. Open Lending may face significant competition for acquisition and other strategic investment opportunities from other well-capitalized companies, many of which have greater financial resources and greater access to debt and equity capital to secure and complete acquisitions or other strategic investments, than Open Lending does. As a result of such competition, Open Lending may be unable to acquire certain assets or businesses, or take advantage of other strategic investment opportunities that Open Lending deems attractive; the purchase price for a given strategic opportunity may be significantly elevated; or certain other terms or circumstances may be substantially more onerous. Any delay or failure on Open Lending’s part to identify, negotiate, finance on favorable terms, consummate and integrate any such acquisition, or other strategic investment, opportunity could impede Open Lending’s growth.

There is no assurance that Open Lending will be able to manage its expanding operations, including from acquisitions, investments or alliances, effectively or that it will be able to continue to grow, and any failure to do so could adversely affect its ability to generate revenue and control its expenses. Furthermore, Open Lending may be responsible for any legacy liabilities of businesses it acquires or be subject to additional liability in connection with other strategic investments. The existence or amount of these liabilities may not be known at the time of acquisition, or other strategic investment, and may have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

The effect of comprehensive U.S. tax reform legislation or challenges to Open Lending’s tax positions could adversely affect its business.

Open Lending operates in multiple jurisdictions and is subject to tax laws and regulations of the United States federal, state and local governments. United States federal, state and local tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to varying interpretations. There is no assurance that Open Lending’s tax positions will not be successfully challenged by relevant tax authorities.

In addition, on December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) (the “Tax Act”). Among a number of significant changes to the U.S. federal income tax rules, the Tax Act reduces the marginal U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, limits the deduction for net interest expense, and shifts the United States toward a more territorial tax system. While Open Lending’s analysis of the Tax Act’s impact on cash tax liability and financial condition has not identified any overall material adverse effect, Open Lending is still evaluating the effects of the Tax Act and there are a number of uncertainties and ambiguities as to the interpretation and application of many of the provisions in the Tax Act. In the absence of guidance on these issues, Open Lending will use what it believes are reasonable interpretations and assumptions in interpreting and applying the Tax Act for purposes of determining its cash tax liabilities and results of operations, which may change as it receives additional clarification and implementation guidance and as the interpretation of the Tax Act evolves over time. It is possible that the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) could issue subsequent guidance or take positions on audit that differ from the interpretations and assumptions that Open Lending previously made, which could have a material adverse effect on its cash tax liabilities, results of operations and financial condition, or an indirect effect on its business through its impact on automotive lenders, merchants and consumers. You are urged to consult your tax adviser regarding the implications of the Tax Act.

Future changes in financial accounting standards may significantly change Open Lending’s reported results of operations.

GAAP is subject to standard setting or interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, FASB, the PCAOB, the SEC and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. A

63

change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on Open Lending’s reported financial results and could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change.

Additionally, Open Lending’s assumptions, estimates and judgments related to complex accounting matters could significantly affect its financial results. GAAP and related accounting pronouncements, implementation guidelines and interpretations with regard to a wide range of matters that are relevant to its business, including revenue recognition, finance charge reversals, and share-based compensation are highly complex and involve subjective assumptions, estimates and judgments by Open Lending. Changes in these rules or their interpretation or changes in underlying assumptions, estimates or judgments by Open Lending could require Open Lending to make changes to its accounting systems that could increase its operating costs and significantly change its reported or expected financial performance.

Risks Related to Open Lending’s Regulatory Environment

Open Lending is subject to federal and state consumer protection laws.

In connection with administration of LPP, Open Lending must comply with various regulatory regimes, including those applicable to consumer credit transactions, various aspects of which are untested as applied to Open Lending’s business model. Insurance producing and claims administration services subject Open Lending to state regulation on a 50-state basis. The complex regulatory environment of the credit and insurance industries are subject to constant change and modification. While changes to statutes and promulgating new regulations may take a substantial amount of time, issuing regulatory guidance with the force of law in the form of opinions, bulletins, and notices can occur quickly. Also, consumer credit and insurance regulators often initiate inquiries into market participants, which can lead to investigations and, ultimately, enforcement actions. As a result, Open Lending is subject to a constantly evolving regulatory environment that is difficult to predict, which may affect Open Lending’s business. The laws to which Open Lending directly or its services by contract are or may be subject to include:

64

While Open Lending has developed policies and procedures designed to assist in compliance with these laws and regulations, no assurance is given that its compliance policies and procedures will be effective. Failure to comply with these laws and with regulatory requirements applicable to Open Lending’s business could subject it to damages, revocation of licenses, class action lawsuits, administrative enforcement actions, and civil and criminal liability, which may harm Open Lending’s business.

Open Lending’s industry is highly regulated and is undergoing regulatory transformation, which results in inherent uncertainty. Changing federal, state, and local laws, as well as changing regulatory enforcement policies and priorities, may negatively impact Open Lending’s business.

In connection with Open Lending’s administration of LPP, Open Lending is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination under United States federal and state laws and regulations. Open Lending is required to comply with numerous federal, state, and local laws and regulations that regulate, among other things, the manner in which Open Lending administers LPP, the terms of the loans that automotive lenders originate, the products of insurance carriers, production of those products, insurance claims administration, and the fees that Open Lending may charge. Any failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could subject Open Lending to lawsuits or governmental actions and/or damage Open Lending’s reputation, which could materially and adversely affect Open Lending’s business. Regulators have broad discretion with respect to the interpretation, implementation, and enforcement of these laws and regulations, including through enforcement actions that could subject Open Lending to civil money penalties, customer remediations, increased compliance costs, and limits or prohibitions on Open Lending’s ability to offer certain products or services or to engage in certain activities. In addition, to the extent that Open Lending undertakes actions requiring regulatory approval or non-objection, regulators may make their approval or non-objection subject to conditions or restrictions that could have a material adverse effect on its business. Moreover, any competitors subject to different, or in some cases less restrictive, legislative or regulatory regimes may have or obtain a competitive advantage over Open Lending.

65

Additionally, federal, state, and local governments and regulatory agencies have proposed or enacted numerous new laws, regulations, and rules related to loans. Federal and state consumer credit and insurance regulators are also enforcing existing laws, regulations, and rules more aggressively and enhancing their supervisory expectations regarding the management of legal and regulatory compliance risks. Consumer finance and insurance regulation is constantly changing, and new laws or regulations, or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, could have a materially adverse impact on Open Lending’s ability to operate as currently intended.

These regulatory changes and uncertainties make Open Lending’s business planning more difficult and could result in changes to its business model and potentially adversely impact its results of operations. New laws or regulations also require Open Lending to incur significant expenses to ensure compliance. As compared to Open Lending’s competitors, Open Lending could be subject to more stringent state or local regulations or could incur marginally greater compliance costs as a result of regulatory changes. In addition, Open Lending’s failure to comply (or to ensure that its agents and third-party service providers comply) with these laws or regulations may result in costly litigation or enforcement actions, the penalties for which could include: revocation of licenses; fines and other monetary penalties; civil and criminal liability; substantially reduced payments by borrowers; modification of the original terms of loans, permanent forgiveness of debt, or inability to, directly or indirectly, collect all or a part of the principal of or interest on loans; and increased purchases of receivables underlying loans originated by automotive lenders and indemnification claims.

Proposals to change the statutes affecting financial services companies are frequently introduced in Congress and state legislatures that, if enacted, may affect its operating environment in substantial and unpredictable ways. In addition, numerous federal and state regulators have the authority to promulgate or change regulations that could have a similar effect on Open Lending’s operating environment. Open Lending cannot determine with any degree of certainty whether any such legislative or regulatory proposals will be enacted and, if enacted, the ultimate impact that any such potential legislation or implementing regulations, or any such potential regulatory actions by federal or state regulators, would have upon Open Lending’s business.

With respect to state regulation, although Open Lending seeks to comply with applicable state insurance, insurance brokering, insurance agency regulations, third-party administration company statutes and similar statutes in all U.S. jurisdictions, and with licensing and other requirements that Open Lending believes may be applicable to it, if Open Lending is found to not have complied with applicable laws, Open Lending could lose one or more of its licenses or authorizations or face other sanctions or penalties or be required to obtain a license in one or more such jurisdictions, which may have an adverse effect on Open Lending’s ability to make the LPP available to borrowers in particular states and, thus, adversely impact Open Lending’s business.

Open Lending is also subject to potential enforcement and other actions that may be brought by state attorneys general or other state enforcement authorities and other governmental agencies. Any such actions could subject Open Lending to civil money penalties and fines, customer remediations, and increased compliance costs, damage its reputation and brand and limit or prohibit Open Lending’s ability to offer certain products and services or engage in certain business practices.

New laws, regulations, policy or changes in enforcement of existing laws or regulations applicable to Open Lending’s business, or reexamination of current practices, could adversely impact Open Lending’s profitability, limit its ability to continue existing or pursue new business activities, require it to change certain of its business practices or alter its relationships with LPP customers, affect retention of key personnel, or expose Open Lending to additional costs (including increased compliance costs and/or customer remediation). These changes also may require Open Lending to invest significant resources, and devote significant management attention, to make any necessary changes and could adversely affect its business.

66

The highly regulated environment in which automotive lenders and insurance carriers operate could have an adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

Automotive lenders and insurance carriers are subject to federal and/or state supervision and regulation. Federal regulation of the banking or insurance industries, along with tax and accounting laws, regulations, rules, and standards, may limit their operations significantly and control the methods by which they conduct business. In addition, compliance with laws and regulations can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations can impose additional compliance requirements. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act imposes significant regulatory and compliance changes on financial institutions. Regulatory requirements affect automotive lenders’ lending and investment practices and insurance carriers’ offerings, among other aspects of their businesses, and restrict transactions between Open Lending and its automotive lenders and insurance carriers. These requirements may constrain the operations of automotive lenders and insurance carriers, and the adoption of new laws and changes to, or repeal of, existing laws may have a further impact on Open Lending’s business.

In choosing whether and how to conduct business with Open Lending, current and prospective automotive lenders and insurance carriers can be expected to take into account the legal, regulatory, and supervisory regimes that apply to them, including potential changes in the application or interpretation of regulatory standards, licensing requirements, or supervisory expectations. Regulators may elect to alter standards or the interpretation of the standards used to measure regulatory compliance or to determine the adequacy of liquidity, certain risk management or other operational practices for financial services companies in a manner that impacts automotive lenders or insurance carriers. Furthermore, the regulatory agencies have extremely broad discretion in their interpretation of the regulations and laws and their interpretation of the quality of automotive lenders’ loan portfolios and other assets. If any regulatory agency’s assessment of the quality of automotive lenders’ assets, operations, lending practices, investment practices or other aspects of their business changes, or those with respect to insurance carriers, it may materially reduce automotive lenders’ or insurance carriers’ earnings, capital ratios and share price in such a way that affects Open Lending’s business.

Bank holding companies, credit unions, financial institutions, automobile lenders, and insurance carriers and producers are extensively regulated and currently face an uncertain regulatory environment. Applicable state and federal laws, regulations, interpretations, including licensing laws and regulations, enforcement policies and accounting principles have been subject to significant changes in recent years, and may be subject to significant future changes. Open Lending cannot predict with any degree of certainty the substance or effect of pending or future legislation or regulation or the application of laws and regulations to automotive lenders and insurance carriers. Future changes may have a material adverse effect on automotive lenders or insurance carriers and, therefore, on Open Lending.

Open Lending is subject to regulatory examinations and investigations and may incur fines, penalties and increased costs that could negatively impact the Open Lending business.

Federal and state agencies have broad enforcement powers over Open Lending, including powers to investigate Open Lending business practices and broad discretion to deem particular practices unfair, deceptive, abusive or otherwise not in accordance with the law. The continued focus of regulators on the consumer financial services industry has resulted, and could continue to result, in new enforcement actions that could, directly or indirectly, affect the manner in which Open Lending conducts its business and increase the costs of defending and settling any such matters, which could negatively impact its business. In some cases, regardless of fault, it may be less time-consuming or costly to settle these matters, which may require Open Lending to implement certain changes to its business practices, provide remediation to certain individuals or make a settlement payment to a given party or regulatory body. There is no assurance that any future settlements will not have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

In addition, the laws and regulations applicable to Open Lending are subject to administrative or judicial interpretation. Some of these laws and regulations have been enacted only recently and may not yet have been

67

interpreted or may be interpreted infrequently. As a result of infrequent or sparse interpretations, ambiguities in these laws and regulations may create uncertainty with respect to what type of conduct is permitted or restricted under such laws and regulations. Any ambiguity under a law or regulation to which Open Lending is subject may lead to regulatory investigations, governmental enforcement actions and private causes of action, such as class action lawsuits, with respect to Open Lending’s compliance with such laws or regulations.

The contours of the Dodd-Frank UDAAP standard remain uncertain, and there is a risk that certain features of the Open Lending business could be deemed to be a UDAAP.

The Dodd-Frank Act prohibits UDAAP and authorizes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) to enforce that prohibition. The CFPB has filed a large number of UDAAP enforcement actions against consumer lenders for practices that do not appear to violate other consumer finance statutes. There is a risk that the CFPB could determine that certain features of automotive lender loans are unfair, deceptive or abusive, which could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

Regulations relating to privacy, information security, and data protection could increase Open Lending’s costs, affect or limit how Open Lending collects and uses personal information, and adversely affect its business opportunities.

Open Lending is subject to various privacy, information security and data protection laws, including requirements concerning security breach notification, and it could be negatively impacted by them. For example, in connection with Open Lending’s administration of LPP, Open Lending is subject to the GLBA and implementing regulations and guidance. Among other things, the GLBA (i) imposes certain limitations on the ability to share consumers’ nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated third parties and (ii) requires certain disclosures to consumers about their information collection, sharing and security practices and their right to “opt out” of the institution’s disclosure of their personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions).

Furthermore, legislators and/or regulators are increasingly adopting or revising privacy, information security and data protection laws that potentially could have a significant impact on Open Lending’s current and planned privacy, data protection and information security-related practices; Open Lending’s collection, use, sharing, retention and safeguarding of consumer and/or employee information; and some of Open Lending’s current or planned business activities. This also could increase Open Lending’s costs of compliance and business operations and could reduce income from certain business initiatives.

Compliance with current or future privacy, information security and data protection laws (including those regarding security breach notification) affecting customer and/or employee data to which Open Lending is subject could result in higher compliance and technology costs and could restrict Open Lending’s ability to provide certain products and services (such as products or services that involve sharing information with third parties or storing sensitive credit card information), which could materially and adversely affect Open Lending’s profitability. Additionally, there is always a danger that regulators can attempt to assert authority over the Open Lending business in the area of privacy, information security and data protection. If Open Lending’s vendors also become subject to laws and regulations in the more stringent and expansive jurisdictions, this could result in increasing costs on Open Lending’s business.

Privacy requirements, including notice and opt-out requirements, under the GLBA and FCRA are enforced by the FTC and by the CFPB through UDAAP and are a standard component of CFPB examinations. State entities also may initiate actions for alleged violations of privacy or security requirements under state law. Open Lending’s failure to comply with privacy, information security and data protection laws could result in potentially significant regulatory investigations and government actions, litigation, fines or sanctions, consumer, automotive lender or merchant actions and damage to Open Lending’s reputation and brand, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

68

If Open Lending was found to be operating without having obtained necessary state or local licenses, it could adversely affect its business.

Certain states have adopted laws regulating and requiring licensing by parties that engage in certain activity regarding consumer finance and insurance transactions, including facilitating and assisting such transactions in certain circumstances. Furthermore, certain states and localities have also adopted laws requiring licensing for consumer debt collection or servicing. While Open Lending believes it has obtained all necessary licenses, the application of some consumer finance or insurance producer and claims administration licensing laws to LPP is unclear. If Open Lending was found to be in violation of applicable state licensing requirements by a court or a state, federal, or local enforcement agency, it could be subject to fines, damages, injunctive relief (including required modification or discontinuation of Open Lending’s business in certain areas), criminal penalties and other penalties or consequences, and the loans originated through LPP could be rendered void or unenforceable in whole or in part, any of which could have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business.

Open Lending may in the future be subject to federal or state regulatory inquiries regarding its business.

From time to time, in the normal course of its business, Open Lending may receive or be subject to, inquiries or investigations by state and federal regulatory agencies and bodies, such as the CFPB, state Attorneys General, state financial regulatory agencies, and other state or federal agencies or bodies regarding LPP, including the origination and servicing of consumer loans, practices by merchants or other third parties, producing insurance policies, administration of insurance claims and licensing, and registration requirements. For example, in the future, Open Lending may enter into regulatory agreements with state agencies regarding issues including automotive lender conduct and oversight and loan pricing. Open Lending also may receive inquiries from state regulatory agencies regarding requirements to obtain licenses from or register with those states, including in states where Open Lending has determined that it is not required to obtain such a license or be registered with the state. Any such inquiries or investigations could involve substantial time and expense to analyze and respond to, could divert management’s attention and other resources from running Open Lending’s business, and could lead to public enforcement actions or lawsuits and fines, penalties, injunctive relief, and the need to obtain additional licenses that it does not currently possess. Open Lending’s involvement in any such matters, whether tangential or otherwise and even if the matters are ultimately determined in Open Lending’s favor, could also cause significant harm to its reputation, lead to additional investigations and enforcement actions from other agencies or litigants, and further divert management attention and resources from the operation of Open Lending’s business. As a result, the outcome of legal and regulatory actions arising out of any state or federal inquiries Open Lending receives could be material to its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows and could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to the Business Combination and Integration of Businesses

Each of Nebula and Open Lending have incurred and will incur substantial costs in connection with the Business Combination and related transactions, such as legal, accounting, consulting and financial advisory fees.

As part of the business combination, each of Nebula and Open Lending are utilizing professional service firms for legal, accounting and financial advisory services. Although the parties have been provided with estimates of the costs for each advisory firm, the total actual costs may exceed those estimates. In addition, the companies are retaining consulting services to assist in the integration of the businesses, including but not limited to organizational decisions, Combined Company business process design, cultural integration and go-to-market integration. These consulting services may extend beyond the current estimated time frame thus resulting in higher than expected costs.

69

While Nebula and Open Lending work to complete the business combination, management’s focus and resources may be diverted from operational matters and other strategic opportunities.

Successful completion of the business combination may place a significant burden on management and other internal resources. The diversion of management’s attention and any difficulties encountered in the transition process could harm the new Combined Company’s business financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, uncertainty about the effect of the business combination on Open Lending’s systems, employees, customers, partners, and other third parties, including regulators, may have an adverse effect on the new Combined Company. These uncertainties may impair the new Combined Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel for a period of time after the completion of the business combination.

Open Lending’s management has limited experience in operating a public company.

Open Lending’s executive officers and directors have limited experience in the management of a publicly traded company. Open Lending’s management team may not successfully or effectively manage its transition to a public company following the Business Combination that will be subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under federal securities laws. Their limited experience in dealing with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies could be a significant disadvantage in that it is likely that an increasing amount of their time may be devoted to these activities which will result in less time being devoted to the management and growth of Open Lending. It is possible that ParentCo will be required to expand its employee base and hire additional employees to support its operations as a public company which will increase its operating costs in future periods.

Following the consummation of the Business Combination, ParentCo will incur significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Following the consummation of the Business Combination, ParentCo will face increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that Open Lending does not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the PCAOB and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements will increase costs and make certain activities more time-consuming. A number of those requirements will require ParentCo to carry out activities Open Lending has not done previously. For example, ParentCo will create new board committees and adopt new internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, additional expenses associated with SEC reporting requirements will be incurred. Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified (for example, if the auditors identify a material weakness or significant deficiency in the internal control over financial reporting), ParentCo could incur additional costs rectifying those issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect ParentCo’s reputation or investor perceptions of it. It may also be more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance. Risks associated with ParentCo’s status as a public company may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on the board of directors or as executive officers. The additional reporting and other obligations imposed by these rules and regulations will increase legal and financial compliance costs and the costs of related legal, accounting and administrative activities. These increased costs will require ParentCo to divert a significant amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting requirements, which could further increase costs.

70

ParentCo may not be able to timely and effectively implement controls and procedures required by Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that will be applicable to it after the Business Combination is consummated.

Open Lending is not currently subject to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. However, following the consummation of the Business Combination and the transactions related thereto, ParentCo will be required to provide management’s attestation on internal controls. The standards required for a public company under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act are significantly more stringent than those required of Open Lending as a privately-held company. Management may not be able to effectively and timely implement controls and procedures that adequately respond to the increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements that will be applicable after the Business Combination. If ParentCo is not able to implement the additional requirements of Section 404(a) in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, it may not be able to assess whether its internal controls over financial reporting are effective, which may subject it to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence and the market price of its shares of common stock.

ParentCo will qualify as an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if it takes advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies, which could make ParentCo’s securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare ParentCo’s performance to the performance of other public companies.

ParentCo will qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act. As such, ParentCo will be eligible for and intends to take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies for as long as it continues to be an emerging growth company, including (i) the exemption from the auditor attestation requirements with respect to internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, (ii) the exemptions from say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and say-on-golden parachute voting requirements and (iii) reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in its periodic reports and proxy statements. ParentCo will remain an emerging growth company until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which the market value of the shares of its common stock that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of that fiscal year, (ii) the last day of the fiscal year in which it has total annual gross revenue of $1.07 billion or more during such fiscal year, (iii) the date on which it has issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in the prior three-year period or (iv) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of its common stocks in its IPO. In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the exemption from complying with new or revised accounting standards provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act as long as ParentCo is an emerging growth company. An emerging growth company can therefore delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. ParentCo may elect not to avail itself of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, it may not be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. Investors may find the common stock less attractive because it will rely on these exemptions, which may result in a less active trading market for the ParentCo Common Stock and its stock price may be more volatile.

Open Lending’s and Nebula’s operations may be restricted during the pendency of the business combination pursuant to terms of the business combination agreement.

Prior to the consummation of the business combination, Open Lending is subject to customary interim operating covenants relating to carrying on its business in the ordinary course of business and is also subject to customary restrictions on actions that may be taken during such period without Nebula’s consent. As a result, Open Lending may be unable, during the pendency of the business combination, to make certain acquisitions and capital expenditures, borrow money and otherwise pursue other actions, even if such actions would prove beneficial.

71

Uncertainty about the effect of the business combination may affect our ability to retain key employees and may materially impact the management, strategy and results of our operation as a Combined Company.

Uncertainty about the effect of the business combination on Open Lending’s business, employees, customers, third parties with whom Open Lending has relationships, and other third parties, including regulators, may have an adverse effect on the Combined Company. These uncertainties may impair the Combined Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel for a period of time after the business combination. If key employees depart because of issues related to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the new Combined Company, our business could be harmed.

The Combined Company may incur successor liabilities due to conduct arising prior to the completion of the Business Combination.

The new Combined Company may be subject to certain liabilities of Nebula and Open Lending. Nebula and Open Lending at times may each become subject to litigation claims in the operation of its business, including, but not limited to, with respect to employee matters and contract matters. From time to time, Open Lending may also face intellectual property infringement, misappropriation, or invalidity/non-infringement claims from third parties, and some of these claims may lead to litigation. Open Lending may initiate claims to assert or defend its intellectual property against third parties. Any litigation may be expensive and time-consuming and could divert management’s attention from our business and negatively affect its operating results or financial condition. The outcome of any litigation cannot be guaranteed, and adverse outcomes can affect Nebula, Open Lending and the new Combined Company negatively.

Our ability to successfully effect the Business Combination and successfully operate the business thereafter will be largely dependent upon the efforts of certain key personnel of Open Lending, all of whom we expect to stay with the Combined Company following the Business Combination. The loss of such key personnel could negatively impact the operations and financial results of the combined business.

Our ability to successfully effect the Business Combination and successfully operate the business following the Closing is dependent upon the efforts of certain key personnel of Open Lending. Although we expect key personnel to remain with the Combined Company following the Business Combination, there can be no assurance that they will do so. It is possible that Open Lending will lose some key personnel, the loss of which could negatively impact the operations and profitability of the Combined Company. Furthermore, following the Closing, certain of the key personnel of Open Lending may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause the Combined Company to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.

Some of Open Lending’s relationships with its customers and vendors may experience disruptions in connection with the Business Combination, which may limit the Combined Company’s business.

Parties with which Open Lending currently does business or may do business in the future, including customers and vendors, may experience uncertainty associated with the Business Combination, including with respect to future business relationships with the Combined Company. As a result, the business relationships of Open Lending may be subject to disruptions if customers, vendors, or others attempt to renegotiate changes in existing business relationships or consider entering into business relationships with parties other than Open Lending. For example, certain customers and collaborators of Open Lending may exercise contractual termination rights as they arise or elect to not renew contracts with Open Lending. These disruptions could harm relationships with existing customers, vendors or others and preclude Open Lending from attracting new customers, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations of Open Lending or the Combined Company. The effect of such disruptions could be exacerbated by any delay in the consummation of the business combination.

72

Risks Related to Our Organizational Structure

The Combined Company’s principal stockholders and management control the Combined Company and their interests may conflict with yours in the future.

Immediately following the anticipated Business Combination and the application of net proceeds, the Combined Company’s executive officers and directors and significant stockholders will own approximately 44.9% to 53.5% of the outstanding voting stock of the Combined Company. Each share of the ParentCo Common Stock of the Combined Company initially entitles its holders to one vote on all matters presented to stockholders generally. Accordingly, those owners, if voting in the same manner, will be able to control the election and removal of the directors of the Combined Company and thereby determine corporate and management policies, including potential mergers or acquisitions, payment of dividends, asset sales, amendment of the certificate of incorporation and bylaws and other significant corporate transactions of the Combined Company for so long as they retain significant ownership. This concentration of ownership may delay or deter possible changes in control of the Combined Company, which may reduce the value of an investment in the ParentCo Common Stock of the Combined Company. So long as they continue to own a significant amount of the combined voting power, even if such amount is less than 50%, they will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control decisions of the Combined Company.

ParentCo will be required to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for certain tax benefits ParentCo may claim, and the amounts of such payments could be significant.

In connection with the Closing, ParentCo will enter into the Tax Receivable Agreement with Nebula, the Blocker, the Blocker Holder, and Open Lending. Prior to the Closing, (i) 100% of the interest in Open Lending was held by the Blocker and the Company Unit Sellers, and (ii) 100% of the Blocker was held by the Blocker Holder.

The Tax Receivable Agreement will generally provide for the payment by ParentCo to the Company Unit Sellers and Blocker Holder, as applicable, of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax that ParentCo actually realizes (or are deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in periods after the Closing as a result of: (i) certain tax attributes of Blocker and/or Open Lending that existed prior to the Business Combination and were attributable to the Blocker; (ii) certain increases in the tax basis of Open Lending’s assets resulting from the Second Merger; (iii) imputed interest deemed to be paid by ParentCo as a result of payments ParentCo makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement; and (iv) certain increases in tax basis resulting from payments ParentCo makes under the Tax Receivable Agreement. ParentCo will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these cash savings. The amount of the cash payments that ParentCo may be required to make under the Tax Receivable Agreement could be significant and is dependent upon future events and assumptions, including the amount and timing of taxable income ParentCo generates in the future, the U.S. federal income tax rate then applicable and the portion of ParentCo’s payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that constitute interest or give rise to depreciable or amortizable tax basis. Moreover, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement will be based on the tax reporting positions that ParentCo determines, which tax reporting positions are subject to challenge by taxing authorities. ParentCo will be dependent on distributions from the Blocker to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and ParentCo cannot guarantee that such distributions will be made in sufficient amounts or at the times needed to enable ParentCo to make its required payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement, or at all. Any payments made by ParentCo to the Company Unit Sellers or Blocker Holder under the Tax Receivable Agreement will generally reduce the amount of overall cash flow that might have otherwise been available to ParentCo. To the extent that ParentCo is unable to make timely payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement for any reason, the unpaid amounts will be deferred and will accrue interest until paid by ParentCo. Nonpayment for a specified period may constitute a breach of a material obligation under the Tax Receivable Agreement, and therefore, may accelerate payments due under the Tax Receivable Agreement. The payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement are also not conditioned upon the Company Unit Sellers or Blocker Holder maintaining a continued ownership interest in ParentCo. See “Certain Agreements Related to the

73

Business Combination—Tax Receivable Agreement” for a discussion of the Tax Receivable Agreement and the related likely benefits to be realized by ParentCo and the TRA Holders and the other parties and beneficiaries thereto.

In certain cases, payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits, if any, ParentCo realizes in respect of the tax attributes subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement.

The Tax Receivable Agreement provides that if ParentCo breaches any of its material obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement, if ParentCo undergoes a change of control or if, at any time, ParentCo elects an early termination of the Tax Receivable Agreement, then the Tax Receivable Agreement will terminate and ParentCo’s obligations, or ParentCo’s successor’s obligations, to make payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement would accelerate and become immediately due and payable. The amount due and payable in those circumstances is determined based on certain assumptions, including an assumption that ParentCo would have sufficient taxable income to fully utilize all potential future tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement. ParentCo may need to incur debt to finance payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement to the extent ParentCo’s cash resources are insufficient to meet ParentCo’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement as a result of timing discrepancies or otherwise.

As a result of the foregoing, (i) ParentCo could be required to make cash payments to the Company Unit Sellers or Blocker Holder that are greater than the specified percentage of the actual benefits ParentCo ultimately realizes in respect of the tax benefits that are subject to the Tax Receivable Agreement, and (ii) ParentCo would be required to make a cash payment equal to the present value of the anticipated future tax benefits that are the subject of the Tax Receivable Agreement, which payment may be made significantly in advance of the actual realization, if any, of such future tax benefits. In these situations, ParentCo’s obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement could have a substantial negative impact on ParentCo’s liquidity and could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing certain mergers, asset sales, other forms of business combination, or other changes of control due to the additional transaction costs a potential acquirer may attribute to satisfying such obligations. There can be no assurance that ParentCo will be able to finance its obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement.

ParentCo will not be reimbursed for any payments made to the Company Unit Sellers or Blocker Holder under the Tax Receivable Agreement in the event that any tax benefits are disallowed.

ParentCo will not be reimbursed for any cash payments previously made to the Company Unit Sellers or Blocker Holder pursuant to the Tax Receivable Agreement if any tax benefits initially claimed by ParentCo are subsequently challenged by a taxing authority and are ultimately disallowed. Instead, any excess cash payments made by ParentCo to a Company Unit Sellers or Blocker Holder will be netted against any future cash payments that ParentCo might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement. However, a challenge to any tax benefits initially claimed by ParentCo may not arise for a number of years following the initial time of such payment or, even if challenged early, such excess cash payment may be greater than the amount of future cash payments that ParentCo might otherwise be required to make under the terms of the Tax Receivable Agreement and, as a result, there might not be future cash payments from which to net against. The applicable U.S. federal income tax rules are complex and factual in nature, and there can be no assurance that the IRS or a court will not disagree with ParentCo’s tax reporting positions. As a result, it is possible that ParentCo could make cash payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement that are substantially greater than ParentCo’s actual cash tax savings. See “Certain Agreements Related to the Business Combination—Tax Receivable Agreement” for a discussion of the Tax Receivable Agreement and the related likely benefits to be realized by ParentCo and the other parties and beneficiaries thereto.

74

The Combined Company’s amended and restated bylaws designate specific courts as the exclusive forum for certain litigation that may be initiated by the Combined Company’s stockholders, which could limit its stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us.

Pursuant to our amended and restated bylaws, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for any state law claim for (1) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (2) any action asserting a claim of or based on a breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of ours to us or our stockholders; (3) any action asserting a claim pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws; or (4) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, or the Delaware Forum Provision. The Delaware Forum Provision will not apply to any causes of action arising under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. Our amended and restated bylaws further provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas shall be the sole and exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, or the Federal Forum Provision. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of ParentCo Common Stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision; provided, however, that stockholders cannot and will not be deemed to have waived our compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.

We recognize that the Delaware Forum Provision and the Federal Forum Provision in our amended and restated bylaws may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims, particularly if the stockholders do not reside in or near the State of Delaware or the State of Texas. Additionally, the forum selection clauses in our amended and restated bylaws may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage the filing of lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees, even though an action, if successful, might benefit our stockholders. In addition, while the Delaware Supreme Court ruled in March 2020 that federal forum selection provisions purporting to require claims under the Securities Act be brought in federal court were “facially valid” under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts will enforce our Federal Forum Provision. If the Federal Forum Provision is found to be unenforceable, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters. The Federal Forum Provision may also impose additional litigation costs on stockholders who assert that the provision is not enforceable or invalid. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than our stockholders.

Risks Related to ParentCo Common Stock

An active trading market for ParentCo Common Stock may never develop or be sustained, which may make it difficult to sell the shares of ParentCo Common Stock you purchase.

An active trading market for ParentCo Common Stock may not develop or continue or, if developed, may not be sustained, which would make it difficult for you to sell your shares of ParentCo Common Stock at an attractive price (or at all). The market price of ParentCo Common Stock may decline below your purchase price, and you may not be able to sell your shares of ParentCo Common Stock at or above the price you paid for such shares (or at all).

There can be no assurance that ParentCo Common Stock will be approved for listing on NASDAQ upon the Closing, or if approved, that ParentCo will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of NASDAQ.

Nebula’s units, Class A Common Stock and warrants are currently listed on NASDAQ. In connection with the Closing, we have applied to list ParentCo Common Stock on NASDAQ upon the Closing under the symbol

75

“LPRO”. As part of the application process, we are required to provide evidence that we are able to meet the initial listing requirements of NASDAQ, which are more rigorous than NASDAQ’s continued listing requirements and include, among other things, a requirement that ParentCo have 300 or more unrestricted round lot holders, at least 150 of which hold unrestricted shares with a minimum value of $2,500, and meet a minimum public float. ParentCo’s ability to meet these listing requirements may depend, in part, on the number of shares of Nebula Common Stock that are redeemed in connection with the Business Combination, as the number of redemptions may impact whether ParentCo has at least 300 unrestricted round lot holders upon the Closing, among other initial listing requirements. ParentCo’s application has not yet been approved, and may not be approved if we are unable to provide evidence satisfactory to NASDAQ that ParentCo will meet these listing requirements.

If ParentCo’s Common Stock is not approved for listing on NASDAQ or, after the Closing, NASDAQ delists ParentCo’s shares from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the listing standards, ParentCo and its stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:

The market price of ParentCo Common Stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

Even if a trading market develops, the market price of ParentCo Common Stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in ParentCo Common Stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market and political conditions, could reduce the market price of shares of ParentCo Common Stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our results of operations could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors due to a number of potential factors, including variations in our quarterly or annual results of operations, additions or departures of key management personnel, the loss of key automotive lenders, changes in our earnings estimates (if provided) or failure to meet analysts’ earnings estimates, publication of research reports about our industry, litigation and government investigations, changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations or differing interpretations or enforcement thereof affecting our business, adverse market reaction to any indebtedness we may incur or securities we may issue in the future, changes in market valuations of similar companies or speculation in the press or the investment community with respect to us or our industry, adverse announcements by us or others and developments affecting us, announcements by our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments, actions by institutional stockholders, and increases in market interest rates that may lead investors in our shares to demand a higher yield, and in response the market price of shares of ParentCo Common Stock could decrease significantly.

These broad market and industry factors may decrease the market price of ParentCo Common Stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The stock market in general has, from time to time, experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. Such litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

76

Our issuance of additional capital stock in connection with financings, acquisitions, investments, our stock incentive plans or otherwise will dilute all other stockholders.

We expect to issue additional capital stock in the future that will result in dilution to all other stockholders. We expect to grant equity awards to employees, directors, and consultants under our stock incentive plans. We may also raise capital through equity financings in the future. As part of our business strategy, we may acquire or make investments in complementary companies, products, or technologies and issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition or investment. Any such issuances of additional capital stock may cause stockholders to experience significant dilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of our common stock to decline.

There may be sales of a substantial amount of ParentCo Common Stock after the Business Combination by Nebula’s stockholders and/or Open Lending’s current owners, and these sales could cause the price of ParentCo’s securities to fall.

After the Business Combination and assuming consummation of the sale of shares pursuant to the Subscription Agreements, there will be approximately 96.6 million shares of ParentCo Common Stock outstanding, including 3,437,500 shares held by the Sponsor that will be subject to certain lock-up and forfeiture arrangements pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, assuming (i) that none of Nebula’s existing Public Stockholders exercise their redemption rights, (ii) that the Initial Stockholders exchange all outstanding Founder Shares for shares of ParentCo Common Stock upon completion of the Business Combination, (iii) the Warrant Amendment is approved by Nebula’s warrantholders and Nebula’s Public Warrants outstanding on the date of the consummation of the Business Combination will be canceled and exchanged for $1.50 per Public Warrant, (iv) no Founder Shares are forfeited pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, and (v) no additional equity securities of Nebula are issued, other than the 20,000,000 shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock currently subscribed for and to be issued in connection with the PIPE. If the actual facts are different than these assumptions, the number of shares of ParentCo Common Stock issued and outstanding will be different. Of our issued and outstanding shares of Nebula Common Stock that were issued prior to the Business Combination, all will be freely transferable, except for any shares held by ParentCo’s “affiliates,” or Nebula’s “affiliates” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Following completion of the Business Combination, we expect that approximately 15.9% of the outstanding shares of ParentCo Common Stock will be held by entities affiliated with us and our executive officers and directors. Sales of substantial amounts of ParentCo Common Stock in the public market after the Business Combination, or the perception that such sales will occur, could adversely affect the market price of ParentCo Common Stock and make it difficult for the Combined Company to raise funds through securities offerings in the future.

The exercise of registration rights may adversely affect the market price of the Nebula Common Stock.

In connection with, and as a condition to the consummation of the Business Combination, the Business Combination Agreement provides that Open Lending, Nebula, ParentCo, certain persons and entities holding membership units of Open Lending and certain persons and entities holding Founder Shares (collectively, the “Holders”) will enter into the Investor Rights Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Investor Rights Agreement, ParentCo will be obligated to file a registration statement to register the resale of certain securities of ParentCo held by the Holders. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the Investor Rights Agreement and subject to certain requirements and customary conditions, including with regard to the number of demand rights that may be exercised, the Holders may demand at any time or from time to time, that ParentCo file a registration statement on Form S-1, or any similar long-form registration statement, or if available, on Form S-3 to register the shares of common stock of ParentCo held by such Holders. The Investor Rights Agreement will also provide the Holders with “piggy-back” registration rights, subject to certain requirements and customary conditions. The Investor Rights Agreement further provides for shares of ParentCo Common Stock held by the Holders to be locked-up for 180 days after the Closing. ParentCo also has agreed to register the shares of ParentCo Common Stock issued in connection with the PIPE. The registration and availability of such a significant number of

77

securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of the ParentCo Common Stock.

Because we have no current plans to pay cash dividends on ParentCo Common Stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your ParentCo Common Stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We have no current plans to pay cash dividends on ParentCo Common Stock. The declaration, amount and payment of any future dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors. Our board of directors may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition and operating results, our available cash, current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions, implications on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders or by our subsidiary to us and such other factors as our board of directors may deem relevant. In addition, the terms of our existing financing arrangements restrict or limit our ability to pay cash dividends. Accordingly, we may not pay any dividends on ParentCo Common Stock in the foreseeable future.

Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may adversely affect the market price of ParentCo Common Stock.

In the future, we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of ParentCo Common Stock or offering debt or other equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes, debt securities convertible into equity or shares of preferred stock. Future acquisitions could require substantial additional capital in excess of cash from operations. We would expect to obtain the capital required for acquisitions through a combination of additional issuances of equity, corporate indebtedness and/or cash from operations.

Issuing additional shares of ParentCo Common Stock or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of ParentCo Common Stock or both. Upon liquidation, holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of ParentCo Common Stock. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion. Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of ParentCo Common Stock. Our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, which may adversely affect the amount, timing and nature of our future offerings.

The Combined Company’s actual financial position and results of operations may differ materially from the unaudited pro forma financial information included in this proxy statement/prospectus.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information included in this proxy statement/prospectus is presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what the Combined Company’s actual financial position or results of operations would have been had the business combination been completed on the dates indicated. See “Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information” for more information.

78

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control of us, which could adversely affect the price of ParentCo Common Stock.

Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These provisions include:

In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by our management or our board of directors. Stockholders who might desire to participate in these types of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is favorable to them. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede your ability to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may adversely affect the market price of ParentCo Common Stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.

If securities and industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for ParentCo Common Stock will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities and industry analysts publish about us and our business. Securities and industry analysts do not currently, and may never, cover ParentCo. If securities and industry analysts do not commence coverage of ParentCo, the trading price of our stock would likely be negatively impacted. In the event securities or industry analysts initiate coverage, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our stock or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of ParentCo or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which might cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Risks Related to Nebula and the Business Combination

Nebula may not be able to complete the Business Combination within the prescribed time frame, in which case Nebula would cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up and Nebula would redeem its Public Shares and liquidate, in which case Nebula’s Public Stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share, or less than such amount in certain circumstances, and Nebula’s warrants will expire worthless.

The Sponsor and Nebula’s officers and directors have agreed that Nebula must complete its initial business combination by June 12, 2020 or such later date as may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders. Nebula may not be able to complete the Business Combination within this time period. If Nebula has not completed its initial business combination within this time period, or amend its amended and restated certificate of incorporation to extend the date by which Nebula must consummate an initial business combination, Nebula will: (i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up; (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than 10

79

business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account and not previously released to us to pay our franchise and income taxes (less $500,000 of interest released to us for working capital purposes and $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the number of then outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will completely extinguish Public Stockholders’ rights as stockholders (including the right to receive further liquidation distributions, if any), subject to applicable law; and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of Nebula’s remaining stockholders and Nebula’s board of directors, dissolve and liquidate, subject in each case to Nebula’s obligations under Delaware law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. In such case, the Public Stockholders may only receive $10.00 per share, and our warrants will expire worthless. In certain circumstances, the Public Stockholders may receive less than $10.00 per share on the redemption of their shares.

The ability of the Public Stockholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock could increase the probability that the Business Combination will be unsuccessful and that Nebula’s stockholders will have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem their Public Shares.

Since the Business Combination Agreement requires that Nebula have, in the aggregate, cash (held both in and outside of the Trust Account) that is equal to or greater than $295 million (less NAC Expenses), the probability that the Business Combination will be unsuccessful is increased if a large number of the Public Shares are tendered for redemption. If the Business Combination is unsuccessful, the Public Stockholders will not receive their pro rata portion of the Trust Account until the Trust Account is liquidated. If the Public Stockholders are in need of immediate liquidity, they could attempt to sell their Public Shares in the open market; however, at such time, the Nebula Class A Common Stock may trade at a discount to the pro rata per share amount in the Trust Account. In either situation, Nebula’s stockholders may suffer a material loss on their investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with the redemption until Nebula is liquidated or Nebula’s stockholders are able to sell their Public Shares in the open market.

If a stockholder fails to receive notice of Nebula’s offer to redeem its Public Shares in connection with the Business Combination, or fails to comply with the procedures for tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.

This proxy statement/prospectus describes the various procedures that must be complied with in order for a Public Stockholder to validly redeem its Public Shares. In the event that a stockholder fails to comply with these procedures, its shares may not be redeemed.

Nebula’s Public Stockholders will not have any rights or interests in funds from the Trust Account, except under certain limited circumstances. To liquidate their investment, therefore, Public Stockholders may be forced to sell their Public Shares or Public Warrants, potentially at a loss.

The Public Stockholders will be entitled to receive funds from the Trust Account only upon the earlier to occur of: (i) Nebula’s completion of an initial business combination, and then only in connection with those shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock that such stockholder properly elected to redeem, subject to the limitations described herein; and (ii) the redemption of the Public Shares if it is unable to complete an initial business combination by June 12, 2020, or such later date as may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders, subject to applicable law and as further described herein. In addition, if Nebula is unable to complete an initial business combination by June 12, 2020 or such later date as may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders, for any reason, compliance with Delaware law may require that Nebula submit a plan of dissolution to its then-existing stockholders for approval prior to the distribution of the proceeds held in the Trust Account. In that case, Public Stockholders may be forced to wait beyond June 12, 2020 or such later date as may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders, before they receive funds from the Trust Account. In no other circumstances will a Public

80

Stockholder have any right or interest of any kind in the Trust Account. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your Public Shares or Public Warrants, potentially at a loss.

The Sponsor and Nebula’s directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may elect to purchase shares from Public Stockholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed business combination and reduce the public “float” of Nebula Class A Common Stock.

The Sponsor and Nebula’s directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates may purchase shares of Nebula Common Stock in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market prior to the completion of the Business Combination, although they are under no obligation to do so. Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgement that such stockholder, although still the record holder of such shares, is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption rights. In the event that the Sponsor and Nebula’s directors, officers, advisors or their affiliates purchase shares in privately negotiated transactions from Public Stockholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling stockholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. The purpose of such purchases could be to vote such shares in favor of the Business Combination and thereby increase the likelihood of obtaining stockholder approval of the Business Combination, or to satisfy the closing condition in the Business Combination Agreement that requires Nebula to have a minimum amount of cash at the Closing. This may result in the completion of the Business Combination that may not otherwise have been possible.

In addition, if such purchases are made, the public “float” of Nebula Class A Common Stock and the number of beneficial holders of Nebula’s securities may be reduced, possibly making it difficult for ParentCo to obtain the quotation, listing or trading of its securities on a national securities exchange.

If a stockholder or a “group” of stockholders are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of Nebula Class A Common Stock, such stockholder or group will lose the ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15% of Nebula Class A Common Stock.

Nebula’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that a Public Stockholder, together with any affiliate of such stockholder or any other person with whom such stockholder is acting in concert or as a “group” (as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from seeking redemption rights with respect to more than an aggregate of 15% of the shares sold in Nebula’s IPO, which Nebula refers to as the “Excess Shares.” However, Nebula would not be restricting its stockholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against its business combination. The inability of a stockholder to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce its influence over Nebula’s ability to complete its business combination and such stockholder could suffer a material loss on its investment in Nebula if it sells Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, such stockholder will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if Nebula completes its business combination. And as a result, such stockholder will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 15% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell its stock in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the Trust Account to the Public Stockholders, Nebula files a voluntary bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against Nebula that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of Nebula’s stockholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by Nebula’s stockholders in connection with Nebula’s liquidation may be reduced.

If, before distributing the proceeds in the Trust Account to the Public Stockholders, Nebula files a voluntary bankruptcy petition or an involuntary bankruptcy petition is filed against Nebula that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be subject to applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in Nebula’s bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over the claims of Nebula’s stockholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the Trust Account, the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by Nebula’s stockholders in connection with Nebula’s liquidation may be reduced.

81

Nebula’s stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against Nebula to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.

Under the DGCL, stockholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against a corporation to the extent of distributions received by them in a dissolution. The pro rata portion of the Trust Account distributed to its Public Stockholders upon the redemption of the Public Shares in the event Nebula does not complete its initial business combination by June 12, 2020 or such later date that may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders, may be considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law. If a corporation complies with certain procedures set forth in Section 280 of the DGCL intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision for all claims against it, including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before any liquidating distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. However, it is Nebula’s intention to redeem its Public Shares as soon as reasonably possible following June 12, 2020 or such later date that may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders, in the event Nebula does not complete its business combination and, therefore, Nebula does not intend to comply with those procedures.

Because Nebula will not be complying with Section 280, Section 281(b) of the DGCL requires Nebula to adopt a plan, based on facts known to Nebula at such time that will provide for its payment of all existing and pending claims or claims that may be potentially brought against Nebula within the 10 years following its dissolution. However, because Nebula is a blank check company, rather than an operating company, and Nebula’s operations are limited to searching for prospective target businesses to acquire, the only likely claims to arise would be from Nebula’s vendors (such as lawyers, investment bankers, etc.) or prospective target businesses. If Nebula’s plan of distribution complies with Section 281(b) of the DGCL, any liability of stockholders with respect to a liquidating distribution is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder, and any liability of the stockholder would likely be barred after the third anniversary of the dissolution. Nebula cannot assure you that it will properly assess all claims that may be potentially brought against it. As such, Nebula’s stockholders could potentially be liable for any claims to the extent of distributions received by them (but no more) and any liability of Nebula’s stockholders may extend beyond the third anniversary of such date. Furthermore, if the pro rata portion of the Trust Account distributed to the Public Stockholders upon the redemption of the Public Shares in the event Nebula does not complete its initial business combination by June 12, 2020, or such later date that may be approved by Nebula’s stockholders, is not considered a liquidation distribution under Delaware law and such redemption distribution is deemed to be unlawful, then pursuant to Section 174 of the DGCL, the statute of limitations for claims of creditors could then be six years after the unlawful redemption distribution, instead of three years, as in the case of a liquidation distribution.

Nebula’s stockholders cannot be sure of the market value of the common stock to be issued upon completion of the Business Combination.

The holders of shares of Nebula Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Business Combination (other than any redeemed shares) will receive one share of common stock of ParentCo Common Stock in exchange for each share of Nebula Class A Common Stock held by them, rather than a number of shares with a particular fixed market value. The market value of Nebula Common Stock at the time of the Business Combination may vary significantly from its price on the date the Business Combination Agreement was executed, the date of the Registration Statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part or the date on which Nebula stockholders vote on the Business Combination. Because the exchange ratio of the shares will not be adjusted to reflect any changes in the market prices of Nebula Common Stock, the market value of the shares of ParentCo Common Stock issued in the Business Combination and the Nebula Common Stock surrendered in the Business Combination may be higher or lower than the value of these shares on earlier

82

dates. 100% of the consideration to be received by Nebula’s stockholders will be shares of ParentCo Common Stock. Following consummation of the Business Combination, the market price of ParentCo’s securities may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond its control, including those described above and the following:

In addition, it is possible that the Business Combination may not be completed until a significant period of time has passed after the special meeting of Nebula’s stockholders. As a result, the market value of Nebula Common Stock may vary significantly from the date of the special meeting to the date of the completion of the Business Combination. You are urged to obtain up-to-date prices for Nebula Common Stock. There is no assurance that the Business Combination will be completed, that there will not be a delay in the completion of the Business Combination or that all or any of the anticipated benefits of the Business Combination will be obtained.

The shares of ParentCo Common Stock to be received by Nebula’s stockholders as a result of the Business Combination will have different rights from shares of Nebula Common Stock.

Following completion of the Business Combination, the Public Stockholders will no longer be stockholders of Nebula but will instead be shareholders of ParentCo. There will be important differences between your current rights as a Nebula stockholder and your rights as a ParentCo shareholder. See “Comparison of Stockholder Rights” for a discussion of the different rights associated with the shares of common stock.

Nebula’s Initial Stockholders have agreed to vote in favor of the Business Combination, regardless of how the Public Stockholders vote.

Unlike many other blank check companies in which the initial stockholders agree to vote their founder shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the Public Stockholders in connection with an initial business combination, Nebula’s Initial Stockholders have agreed to vote their Founder Shares, as well as any Public Shares purchased during or after Nebula’s IPO, in favor of the Business Combination. Nebula’s Initial Stockholders own 20% of the outstanding shares of Nebula Common Stock. Accordingly, it is more likely that the necessary stockholder approval to complete the Business Combination will be received than would be the case if Nebula’s Initial Stockholders agreed to vote their Founder Shares in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by the Public Stockholders.

83

The exercise of discretion by Nebula’s directors and officers in agreeing to changes to the terms of or waivers of closing conditions in the Business Combination Agreement may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether such changes to the terms of the Business Combination Agreement or waivers of conditions are appropriate and in the best interests of Nebula securityholders.

In the period leading up to the Closing, other events may occur that, pursuant to the Business Combination Agreement, would require Nebula to agree to amend the Business Combination Agreement, to consent to certain actions or to waive rights that Nebula is entitled to under those agreements. Such events could arise because of changes in the course of Open Lending’s business, a request by Open Lending to undertake actions that would otherwise be prohibited by the terms of the Business Combination Agreement or the occurrence of other events that would have a material adverse effect on Open Lending’s business and would entitle us to terminate the Business Combination Agreement. In any of such circumstances, it would be in Nebula’s discretion, acting through its board of directors, to grant Nebula’s consent or waive its rights. The existence of the financial and personal interests of the directors described elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus may result in a conflict of interest on the part of one or more of the directors between what he may believe is best for Nebula and its securityholders and what he may believe is best for himself or his affiliates in determining whether or not to take the requested action. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, Nebula does not believe there will be any changes or waivers that its directors and officers would be likely to make after stockholder approval of the Business Combination has been obtained. While certain changes could be made without further stockholder approval, if there is a change to the terms of the transaction that would have a material impact on the stockholders, Nebula will be required to circulate a new or amended proxy statement/prospectus or supplement thereto and resolicit the vote of its stockholders with respect to the Business Combination Proposal.

Nebula’s board of directors did not obtain a fairness opinion in determining whether or not to proceed with the Business Combination and, as a result, the terms may not be fair from a financial point of view to the Public Stockholders.

In analyzing the Business Combination, the Nebula board of directors conducted significant due diligence on Open Lending. For a complete discussion of the factors utilized by Nebula’s board of directors in approving the Business Combination, see the section entitled, “The Business Combination—Nebula’s Board of Directors’ Reasons for the Approval of the Business Combination.” The Nebula board of directors believes because of the financial skills and background of its directors, it was qualified to conclude that the Business Combination was fair from a financial perspective to its stockholders and that Open Lending’s fair market value was at least 80% of Nebula’s net assets (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Nebula’s board of directors did not obtain a fairness opinion to assist it in its determination. Accordingly, Nebula’s board of directors may be incorrect in its assessment of the Business Combination.

The Sponsor and Nebula’s executive officers and directors have potential conflicts of interest in recommending that warrantholders vote in favor of the Warrant Amendment Proposal and in recommending that stockholders vote in favor of approval of the Business Combination Proposal and approval of the other proposals described in the Registration Statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part.

When you consider the recommendation of Nebula’s board of directors in favor of approval of the Business Combination Proposal, the Charter Amendment Proposals, the Nasdaq Proposal, the 2020 Plan Proposal and in favor of approval of the Warrant Amendment Proposal, you should keep in mind that certain of Nebula’s directors and officers have interests in the Business Combination that are different from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder or warrantholder. These interests include, among other things:

84

These interests may influence Nebula’s directors in making their recommendation to vote in favor of the Warrant Amendment Proposal and in favor of the Business Combination Proposal and the other proposals described in the Registration Statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus is a part. You should also read the section entitled “The Business Combination.”

If Nebula fails to consummate the PIPE, it may not have enough funds to complete the Business Combination.

As a condition to closing the Business Combination, the Business Combination Agreement provides that Nebula must have $295 million (less NAC Expenses) available at upon the closing of the Business Combination. Because the amount in the Trust Account is less than $295 million, Nebula requires the funds from the PIPE in order to consummate the Business Combination. While Nebula has entered into Subscription Agreements to raise an aggregate of approximately $200 million immediately prior to the Closing, there can be no assurance that the counterparties to the Subscription Agreements (as defined below) will perform their obligations thereunder. If Nebula fails to consummate the PIPE, it is unlikely that Nebula will have sufficient funds to meet the condition to Closing in the Business Combination Agreement.

If Nebula’s warrantholders fail to approve the Warrant Amendment Proposal, Nebula and Open Lending may not be able to complete the Business Combination.

Nebula is seeking the vote of holders of Public Warrants to approve and adopt an amendment to the terms of the Warrant Agreement to provide that, upon consummation of the Business Combination, each of Nebula’s outstanding Public Warrants, which entitle the holder to purchase one share of Nebula Class A Common Stock, will be exchanged for cash in the amount of $1.50 per Public Warrant. Approval of the Warrant Amendment requires the consent of a majority of the Public Warrants issued and outstanding as of the record date. The Warrant Amendment will be contingent upon Nebula’s stockholders approving the Business Combination. Pursuant to the Founder Support Agreement, our Sponsor agreed to forfeit (without consideration) all of their Nebula warrants to Nebula in connection with the consummation of the Business Combination, which warrants constitute all of the Private Placement Warrants. The intent of the Warrant Amendment and the warrant exchange is to reduce the dilutive effect of the presently issued and outstanding Public Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 9,166,666 shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock. In the event that Nebula’s warrantholders fail to approve the Warrant Amendment, Nebula and Open Lending may not be able to consummate the Business Combination.

Subsequent to the completion of the Business Combination, ParentCo may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on ParentCo’s financial condition, results of operations and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.

Although Nebula has conducted due diligence on Open Lending, we cannot assure you that our diligence surfaced all material issues that may be present inside Open Lending, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of Open Lending and outside of Nebula’s control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, ParentCo may be forced to later write-down

85

or write off assets, restructure its operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in ParentCo reporting losses. Even if Nebula’s due diligence successfully identified certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with Nebula’s preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and would not have an immediate impact on Nebula’s liquidity, the fact that Nebula reports charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about Nebula or its securities. Accordingly, any stockholders who choose to remain stockholders following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such stockholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by Nebula’s officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy statement/prospectus relating to the Business Combination contained an actionable material misstatement or material omission.

Public stockholders at the time of the Business Combination who purchased their Nebula Units in Nebula’s IPO and do not exercise their redemption rights may pursue rescission rights and related claims.

The Public Stockholders may allege that some aspects of the Business Combination are inconsistent with the disclosure contained in the prospectus issued by Nebula in connection with the offer and sale in its IPO of units, including the structure of the proposed Business Combination. Consequently, a Public Stockholder who purchased shares in the IPO (excluding the Initial Stockholders) and still holds them at the time of the Business Combination and who does not seek to exercise redemption rights might seek rescission of the purchase of the Units such holder acquired in the IPO. A successful claimant for damages under federal or state law could be awarded an amount to compensate for the decrease in the value of such holder’s shares caused by the alleged violation (including, possibly, punitive damages), together with interest, while retaining the shares. If stockholders bring successful rescission claims against Nebula, it may not have sufficient funds following the consummation of the Business Combination to pay such claims, or if claims are successfully brought against ParentCo following the consummation of the Business Combination, ParentCo’s results of operations could be adversely affected and, in any event, ParentCo may be required in connection with the defense of such claims to incur expenses and divert employee attention from other business matters.

Nebula’s stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after consummation of the Business Combination and will exercise less influence over management.

After the completion of the Business Combination, Nebula’s stockholders will own a smaller percentage of ParentCo than they currently own of Nebula. Upon completion of the Business Combination, it is anticipated that Nebula’s stockholders (including the Initial Stockholders), will own approximately 44.2%, of the common stock issued and outstanding immediately after the consummation of the Business Combination, assuming that none of The Public Stockholders exercise their redemption rights. Consequently, Nebula’s stockholders, as a group, will have reduced ownership and voting power in ParentCo compared to their ownership and voting power in Nebula.

86

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet of the Combined Company as of March 31, 2020 and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations of the Combined Company for the year ended December 31, 2019 and for the three months ended March 31, 2020 present the combination of the financial information of Nebula and Open Lending, after giving effect to the Business Combination and related adjustments described in the accompanying notes. Nebula and Open Lending are collectively referred to herein as the “Companies,” and the Companies, subsequent to the Business Combination, are referred to herein as the Combined Company or ParentCo.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the for the year ended December 31, 2019 and three months ended March 31, 2020 give pro forma effect to the Business Combination as if it had occurred on January 1, 2019. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of March 31, 2020 gives pro forma effect to the Business Combination as if it was completed on March 31, 2020.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information are based on and should be read in conjunction with the audited and unaudited historical financial statements of each of Nebula Acquisition Corporation and Open Lending and the notes thereto, as well as the disclosures contained in the sections titled “Nebula Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Open Lending Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been presented for illustrative purposes only and do not necessarily reflect what the Combined Company’s financial condition or results of operations would have been had the Business Combination occurred on the dates indicated. Further, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information also may not be useful in predicting the future financial condition and results of operations of the Combined Company. The actual financial position and results of operations may differ significantly from the pro forma amounts reflected herein due to a variety of factors. The unaudited pro forma adjustments represent management’s estimates based on information available as of the date of these unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and are subject to change as additional information becomes available and analyses are performed.

On January 5, 2020, Nebula entered into the Business Combination Agreement with Open Lending, under the terms of which, Nebula will acquire Open Lending through a new Delaware holding company, the Combined Company, which will become a publicly-listed entity. After giving effect to the Business Combination, the Company will own, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding equity interests of Open Lending and its subsidiaries and the Open Lending unitholders will hold a portion of the ParentCo Common Stock. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined information contained herein assumes that the Nebula’s stockholders approve the proposed Business Combination. Nebula’s stockholders may elect to redeem their shares of Class A Common Stock for cash even if they approve the proposed Business Combination. Nebula cannot predict how many of its public stockholders will exercise their right to have their Class A Common Stock redeemed for cash. As a result, the Combined Company has elected to provide the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information under two different redemption scenarios, which produce different allocations of total Combined Company equity between holders of the ParentCo Common Stock. As described in greater detail in Note 2 of the “Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information”, the first scenario, or “no redemption scenario”, assumes that none of Nebula’s public stockholders will exercise their right to have their Nebula Class A Common Stock redeemed for cash, and the second scenario, or “maximum redemption scenario”, assumes that holders of the maximum number of shares of Nebula Class A Common Stock that could be redeemed for cash while still leaving sufficient cash available to consummate the Business Combination will exercise their right to have their Nebula Class A Common Stock redeemed for cash. The actual results will be within the parameters described by the two scenarios, however, there can be no assurance regarding which scenario will be closest to the actual results. Under both scenarios, Open Lending is considered the accounting acquirer, as further discussed in Note 2 of the “Notes to The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information”.

87

COMBINED COMPANY

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED

COMBINED BALANCE SHEET

March 31, 2020

(in thousands)